Key result
VTE chemoprophylaxis linked to ~277% higher VTE incidence versus no prophylaxis after tumor craniotomy.
Why the study?
The incidence and predictors of VTEs after craniotomy for tumor resection are not well established, and the efficacy and risks of VTE chemoprophylaxis remain controversial.
What is the incidence and what are the predictors of venous thromboembolic events in patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection?
Observational (n=1,622)
No
What is the incidence and what are the predictors of venous thromboembolic events in patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.3% vs 2.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
The incidence of VTE after craniotomy for tumor resection is low (3.0%) even without routine prophylactic anticoagulation, though certain high-risk features strongly predict its occurrence.
Should not alter chemoprophylaxis decisions; leaves open confounding by indication in this Level 5 review.
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to investigate the incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) after craniotomy for tumor resection, which are not well established, and the efficacy of and risks associated with VTE chemoprophylaxis, which remains controversial. METHODS: The authors investigated the incidence of VTEs in a consecutive series of patients presenting to the authors' institution for resection of an intracranial lesion between 2012 and 2017. Information on patient and tumor characteristics was collected and independent predictors of VTEs were determined using stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. Review of the literature was performed by searching MEDLINE using the keywords "venous thromboembolism," "deep venous thrombosis," "pulmonary embolism," "craniotomy," and "brain neoplasms." RESULTS: There were 1622 patients included for analysis. A small majority of patients were female (52.6%) and the mean age of the cohort was 52.9 years (SD 15.8 years). A majority of intracranial lesions were intraaxial (59.3%). The incidence of VTEs was 3.0% and the rates of deep venous thromboses and pulmonary emboli were 2.3% and 0.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, increasing patient age (unit OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.05; p = 0.018), history of VTE (OR 7.26, 95% CI 3.24-16.27; p < 0.001), presence of motor deficit (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.43-4.88; p = 0.002), postoperative intracranial hemorrhage (OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.51-12.55; p < 0.001), and prolonged intubation or reintubation (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.28-8.32; p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased odds of a VTE. There were 192 patients who received VTE chemoprophylaxis (11.8%); the mean postoperative day of chemoprophylaxis initiation was 4.6 (SD 3.8). The incidence of VTEs was higher in patients receiving chemoprophylaxis than in patients not receiving chemoprophylaxis (8.3% vs 2.2%; p < 0.001). There were 30 instances of clinically significant postoperative hemorrhage (1.9%), with only 1 hemorrhage occurring after initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis (0.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The study results show the incidence and predictors of VTEs after craniotomy for tumor resection in this patient population. The incidence of VTE within this cohort appears low and comparable to that observed in other institutional series, despite the lack of routine prophylactic anticoagulation in the postoperative setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rinaldo et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Craniotomy for tumor resection (n=1,622). VTE chemoprophylaxis vs. No VTE chemoprophylaxis was evaluated on Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) (p=<0.001). In patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection, the incidence of VTEs was higher in those receiving chemoprophylaxis than in those not receiving it (8.3% vs 2.2%; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: