Key result
Primary renal-derived swine macrophages are permissive to both cell-adapted and wild-type African Swine Fever Virus, showing successive increases in viral DNA and infectious virus titers over 7 days.
Primary renal-derived swine macrophages serve as a useful and consistent primary cell model for the isolation and propagation of African Swine Fever Virus.
Supports primary renal swine macrophages as an ASFV model; extends in vitro tools while leaving open broader validation.
African swine fever virus (ASFV) causes hemorrhagic disease in domestic pigs by replicating mainly in monocyte/macrophage lineages. Various primary cells including pulmonary alveolar macrophages have been used for the propagation of ASFV on this account. However, ethical constraints and consistency problems exist as it is necessary to harvest same phenotype of primary cells in order to continue a study. We suggested renal-derived swine macrophages as a novel primary cell candidate to address these issues. These primary cells proved to be permissive to both cell adapted ASFV and a wild-type ASFV. Compared to the commercial cell line MA-104, the renal-derived macrophages were more suitable to isolate the field virus. The consistent molecular characteristics of the renal-derived macrophages were demonstrated by immunocytochemistry with antibodies against macrophage cell surface markers including CD163, CD172a, and Iba-1. Viral protein p30 and p72 expression in ASFV infected macrophages was confirmed by immunocytochemistry by use of specific monoclonal antibodies. We observed increase of cell-free viral DNA and infectious virus titer in infected cell supernatant in successive days-post-infection. These results demonstrated that primary renal-derived swine macrophages are useful for ASFV isolation and propagation in terms of cell phenotypes, susceptibility to the virus, and virus production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2021) studied African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) infection (in vitro). African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) infection vs. Uninfected macrophages and MA-104 cell line was evaluated on Viral replication (viral DNA and infectious virus titer) and viral protein expression. Primary renal-derived swine macrophages are permissive to both cell-adapted and wild-type African Swine Fever Virus, showing successive increases in viral DNA and infectious virus titers over 7 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: