Key result
African swine fever virus enters human THP-1-derived macrophages and initiates transcription but cannot complete the full replicative cycle, leading to decreased infectious titers over subsequent passages.
Why the study?
Humans exhibit resistance to African swine fever virus despite environmental contact, and the decisive factor is likely target macrophage reaction; therefore, this study aimed to characterize human macrophage responses and viral replication features.
ASFV can enter human macrophages and induce an immune response but cannot complete its replication cycle, providing a mechanistic basis for human resistance to the virus.
Hypothesis-generating for human resistance to ASFV; in vivo studies needed before translational implications.
African swine fever (ASF) virus (ASFV) and ASF-like viral sequences were identified in human samples and sewage as well as in different water environments. Pigs regularly experience infections with ASF virus. The considerable stability of the virus in the environment suggests that there is ongoing and long-term contact between humans and the ASF virus. However, humans exhibit resistance to the ASF virus, and the decisive factor in the development of infection in the body is most likely the reaction of target macrophages to the virus. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize the response of human macrophages to the virus and explore the distinct features of the viral replication cycle within human macrophages. Our findings have shown that the virus effectively initiated the replication process by entering human macrophages. Subsequently, the virus shed its capsid, initiated the transcription of numerous viral genes, and at least some of these genes executed their functions. In THP-1-derived macrophages (Mφ0), ASFV implemented a number of functions to suppress cell activity, but the timing of their implementation was slower compared to virus-sensitive porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs). Besides, the virus was unable to complete the full replication cycle in human Mφ0, as indicated by the absence of viral factories and a decrease in infectious titers of the virus with each subsequent passage. Overall, the infection of Mφ0 with ASFV caused significant alterations in their phenotype and functions such as increased TLR2, TLR3, CD80, CD36, CD163, CXCR2, and surface LAMP-1 expression. Increased production of TNF, IL-10, and decreased production of IFN-α were also observed. Taken together, the virus enters human THP-1-derived macrophages, starts transcription, and causes a response from target cells, but is unable to complete the replicative cycle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karalyan et al. (2023) studied African swine fever virus infection. African swine fever virus (Armenia07 strain) vs. Porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs) was evaluated on Viral replication and infectious titers. African swine fever virus enters human THP-1-derived macrophages and initiates transcription but cannot complete the full replicative cycle, leading to decreased infectious titers over subsequent passages.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: