Key result
Elevated plasma sEPCR levels (OR 3.14) and decreased left ventricular global longitudinal strain (OR 1.44) were independent predictors of slow coronary flow, with their combination yielding an AUC of 0.89.
Why the study?
Slow coronary flow is associated with inflammation and decreased LV GLS, prompting investigation into the relationship with sEPCR and the predictive value of sEPCR and LV GLS for slow coronary flow.
Does soluble endothelial protein C receptor combined with left ventricular global longitudinal strain predict slow coronary flow in patients with normal or near-normal epicardial coronary arteries?
Case-Control (n=62)
No
Does soluble endothelial protein C receptor combined with left ventricular global longitudinal strain predict slow coronary flow in patients with normal or near-normal epicardial coronary arteries?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The combination of plasma sEPCR levels and LV GLS provides a non-invasive, highly predictive biomarker strategy for identifying slow coronary flow.
BACKGROUND: Slow coronary flow (SCF) is an angiographic entity characterized by delayed coronary opacification without an evident obstructive lesion in the epicardial coronary artery. However, patients with SCF have decreased left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS). SCF is associated with inflammation, and soluble endothelial protein C receptor (sEPCR) is a potential biomarker of inflammation. Therefore, under evaluation herein, was the relationship between SCF and sEPCR and the predictive value of sEPCR and LV GLS for SCF was investigated. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with SCF and 34 controls were enrolled. SCF was diagnosed by the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (TFC). The plasma level of sEPCR was quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. LV GLS was measured by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. RESULTS: Plasma sEPCR was significantly higher in patients with SCF than in controls and was positively correlated with the mean TFC (r = 0.67, p < 0.001) and number of involved vessels (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). LV GLS was decreased in patients with SCF compared to that in controls. sEPCR level (OR = 3.14, 95% CI 1.55-6.36, p = 0.001) and LV GLS (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.02-2.04, p = 0.04) were independent predictors of SCF. sEPCR predicted SCF (area under curve [AUC]: 0.83); however, sEPCR > 9.63 ng/mL combined with LV GLS > -14.36% demonstrated better predictive power (AUC: 0.89; sensitivity: 75%; specificity: 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SCF have increased plasma sEPCR and decreased LV GLS. sEPCR may be a useful potential biomarker for SCF, and sEPCR combined with LV GLS can better predict SCF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) conducted a case-control in Slow coronary flow (n=62). Plasma soluble endothelial protein C receptor (sEPCR) level vs. Controls with normal coronary flow was evaluated on Independent prediction of slow coronary flow (OR 3.14, 95% CI 1.55-6.36, p=0.001). Elevated plasma sEPCR levels (OR 3.14) and decreased left ventricular global longitudinal strain (OR 1.44) were independent predictors of slow coronary flow, with their combination yielding an AUC of 0.89.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: