Key result
Incubation in 14.8 mg/dL uric acid triggers erythrocyte aggregation versus controls.
Why the study?
Does uric acid incubation cause erythrocyte aggregation in normal and IgG-coated erythrocytes?
Does uric acid incubation cause erythrocyte aggregation in normal and IgG-coated erythrocytes?
Uric acid induces erythrocyte aggregation in vitro, providing a potential mechanistic link between hyperuricemia, increased blood viscosity, and atherothrombosis risk.
Uric acid may be a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, although the data conflict and the mechanism by which it may cause cardiovascular disease is uncertain. This study was performed to test the hypothesis that uric acid, an anion at physiologic pH, can cause erythrocyte aggregation, which itself is associated with cardiovascular disease. Normal erythrocytes and erythrocytes with a positive direct antiglobulin test for surface IgG were incubated for 15 minutes in 14.8 mg/dL uric acid. Erythrocytes without added uric acid were used as controls. Erythrocytes were then examined microscopically for aggregation. Aggregates of up to 30 erythrocytes were noted when normal erythrocytes were incubated in uric acid. Larger aggregates were noted when erythrocytes with surface IgG were incubated in uric acid. Aggregation was negligible in controls. These data show that uric acid causes erythrocyte aggregation. The most likely mechanism is decreased erythrocyte zeta potential. Erythrocyte aggregates will increase blood viscosity at low shear rates and increase the risk of atherothrombosis. In this manner, hyperuricemia and decreased zeta potential may be risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sloop et al. (2016) studied Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Uric acid vs. Erythrocytes without added uric acid was evaluated on Erythrocyte aggregation. Incubation of normal and IgG-coated erythrocytes in 14.8 mg/dL uric acid caused erythrocyte aggregation, whereas aggregation was negligible in controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: