Key result
Shifting to a sequential OPV-IPV schedule in India is recommended to eliminate the risk of vaccine-associated paralytic polio and vaccine-derived poliovirus.
Why the study?
Does shifting to an IPV or sequential OPV-IPV schedule prevent vaccine-derived poliovirus infections compared to OPV alone in India?
Does shifting to an IPV or sequential OPV-IPV schedule prevent vaccine-derived poliovirus infections compared to OPV alone in India?
The introduction of IPV in India's immunization schedule is necessary to achieve complete polio eradication by preventing vaccine-derived poliovirus infections.
Polio is a communicable disease caused by poliovirus that may attack nerve cells of the brain and spinal cord. The victims develop neurological complications, likes stiffness of the neck, muscular weakness, or paralysis of one or more limbs. In severe cases, it may be fatal due to respiratory paralysis. The world has seen tremendous gains in polio eradication over the past year. India and Nigeria saw a reduction in cases of almost 95% from 2009 to 2010, and cases of wild poliovirus type 3 (WPV3) fell by 92% globally over the same period. In fact, no case has been reported in India since February 2011, such that India may be on the verge of eradicating polio. Nevertheless, polio control experts are particularly worried about Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus (VDPV). Global surveillance efforts picked up 430 cases of VDPV from several countries between July 2009 and March 2011. In India, 7 cases of VDPV were reported during the year 2011. As long as OPV is used, virologists say that the world is at risk of VDPV causing polio in unprotected children. Achieving a polio-free world will require the "cessation of all OPV" and with it the elimination of the risk of vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) or VDPV infections. To this effect, in 2011 the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) will produce and develop a new roadmap for VDPV Elimination. Several countries have shifted from all OPV to sequential OPV-IPV schedules and all-IPV schedules with elimination of live poliovirus. IPV will be indispensable in the post-eradication era when use of OPV has to stop but "vaccination against polio" cannot stop. IPV offers complete individual protection and has been considered as an additional tool at present for those who can afford the vaccine, and since we are nearing the eradication of polio, it is time to shift from OPV to sequential OPV-IPV schedule in India. Such a strategy will avoid inevitable problems with VAPP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verma et al. (2012) conducted an editorial in Polio. Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) vs. Oral polio vaccine (OPV) was evaluated. Shifting to a sequential OPV-IPV schedule in India is recommended to eliminate the risk of vaccine-associated paralytic polio and vaccine-derived poliovirus.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: