Key result
Admission heart rates ≥100 or <60 bpm linked to up to ~145% greater in-hospital AMI mortality.
Why the study?
To quantify the shape and strength of the association between admission heart rate and in-hospital death in contemporary acute myocardial infarction after adjustment for modern therapies and haemodynamic variables.
Does admission heart rate outside the 60-99 bpm range predict in-hospital mortality in adults with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=1,510)
No
Does admission heart rate outside the 60-99 bpm range predict in-hospital mortality in adults with acute myocardial infarction?
Odds Ratio: 2.45 (95% CI 1.56–3.85)
Absolute Event Rate: 17.3% vs 7.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
Admission heart rate exhibits a U-shaped, independent relationship with early mortality in modern AMI care, with both bradycardia and tachycardia identifying high-risk patients.
Admission HR extremes may flag higher-risk AMI patients; leaves open whether HR modulation improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the shape and strength of the association between heart rate (HR) recorded during the first 30 min of intensive-care admission and in-hospital death in contemporary acute myocardial infarction (AMI), after adjustment for modern reperfusion, pharmacotherapy, and haemodynamic variables. METHODS: We extracted 1,510 adults with a primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis of AMI (410.xx) from MIMIC-III (2008-2012). HR was defined as the mean of the first three electrocardiographic readings obtained within 30 min of ICU triage, before administration of rate-modifying drugs. We modelled HR both as clinically meaningful categories (< 60, 60-99, ≥ 100 bpm) and as a continuous exposure using restricted cubic splines (RCS). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, Killip class, systolic blood pressure, coronary revascularisation, β-blocker use, atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, serum creatinine, haemoglobin, white blood cell count, sodium, potassium, glucose, platelet count and anion gap. Pre-specified subgroup analyses compared ST-elevation MI (STEMI) with non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). RESULTS: Mean age was 66.7 ± 13.9 years; 33.6% were women; STEMI accounted for 42%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 10.9%. HR ≥ 100 bpm (23% of patients) was associated with higher death risk (adjusted OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.56-3.85) versus 60-99 bpm. Bradycardia < 60 bpm (15%) was also associated with excess risk (adjusted OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.02-2.45), yielding a U-shaped RCS curve (non-linearity p = 0.01). The HR-mortality gradient was steeper in STEMI than in NSTE-ACS (interaction p = 0.04). Findings were robust after including the 46 patients who died within 24 h of admission. CONCLUSION: Admission HR exhibits a U-shaped, independent relation with early mortality in modern AMI care; values outside 60-99 bpm identify high-risk patients despite urgent reperfusion and optimal medical therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=1,510). Admission heart rate ≥ 100 bpm vs. Admission heart rate 60-99 bpm was evaluated on All-cause in-hospital death (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.56-3.85, p=<0.001). Admission heart rates ≥ 100 bpm (OR 2.45) and < 60 bpm (OR 1.58) were both associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to 60-99 bpm in acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: