Key result
Sentinel CPS during TAVR shows no difference in cumulative perioperative cerebral desaturation versus no device.
Why the study?
The impact of inserting the Sentinel Cerebral Protection System inside brain-supplying arteries on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation during TAVR is unknown.
Does cerebral embolic protection using the Sentinel-CPS affect cerebral oxygen saturation in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR?
Observational (n=20)
Does cerebral embolic protection using the Sentinel-CPS affect cerebral oxygen saturation in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR?
The use of the Sentinel-CPS during TAVR does not negatively impact cerebral perfusion and oxygenation as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sentinel-CPS insertion appears safe for cerebral oxygenation in TAVR; leaves open net clinical benefit pending larger randomized trials.
Purpose The Sentinel Cerebral Protection System (Sentinel-CPS) is increasingly used in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the impact of inserting the Sentinel-CPS inside the brain-supplying arteries on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation is unknown. Methods Twenty patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR with (n = 10) and without (n = 10) cerebral embolic protection using the Sentinel-CPS were prospectively observed. All patients received conscious sedation and cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) was continuously measured with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The cumulative perioperative cerebral desaturation was calculated for each patient by multiplying rSO2 below an individualized desaturation threshold by time. In addition, rSO2 values at the time of Sentinel-CPS insertion, filter positioning, and device retraction were analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in cumulative cerebral desaturation in patients with Sentinel-CPS (median [IQR]) (0 [0/81] s%) and without (median [IQR]) (0 [0/23] s%), p = .762. A total of 6 patients (33.3%) experienced a perioperative decrease in rSO2 below the individualized desaturation threshold (n = 3 with Sentinel-CPS, n = 3 without Sentinel-CPS; p = 1.000). Cerebral desaturation was detected during valve deployment (n = 5) and after postdilatation (n = 1). No desaturation events occurred during Sentinel-CPS insertion, filter positioning, or retraction. Conclusion Our pilot study revealed no difference in cumulative perioperative cerebral desaturation between TAVR with and without Sentinel-CPS. Catheter- and filter-based manipulations in the brain-supplying arteries for Sentinel-CPS application were not associated with a decrease of cerebral perfusion and oxygenation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ernst et al. (2021) conducted an observational in transfemoral TAVR (n=20). Sentinel Cerebral Protection System (Sentinel-CPS) vs. without Sentinel-CPS was evaluated on cumulative perioperative cerebral desaturation (p=.762). The Sentinel Cerebral Protection System during TAVR was not associated with a difference in cumulative perioperative cerebral desaturation compared to no device (median 0 vs 0 s%; P=0.762).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: