Key result
Genotype-positive DCM linked to a ~17% lower rate of LVRR versus genotype-negative patients.
Why the study?
Left ventricular reverse remodeling is a key therapeutic goal in dilated cardiomyopathy, but its genetic predictors and prognostic impact remain uncertain.
Does genotype influence left ventricular reverse remodeling and long-term prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=711)
Does genotype influence left ventricular reverse remodeling and long-term prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 39% vs 47%
p-value: p=.036
In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, genotype is a major determinant of left ventricular reverse remodeling, with genotype-positive patients having lower rates of initial improvement and higher rates of subsequent deterioration linked to adverse outcomes.
Genotype may inform LVRR expectations in DCM; leaves open whether genotyping should guide therapy.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) is a key therapeutic goal in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, its genetic predictors and prognostic impact remain uncertain. METHODS: We analyzed genotyped DCM patients with serial echocardiograms from the Spanish DCM study. The main objective was to assess the influence of genotype on LVRR, defined by improvement in ejection fraction within 12± 6 months. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events, end-stage heart failure (HF), and major ventricular arrhythmias. RESULTS: A total of 711 patients were included (67% male, mean age 50.8 years, baseline ejection fraction 31%, 44% genotype positive). LVRR occurred in 39% of genotype-positive vs 47% of genotype-negative patients (P=.036). Independent predictors of LVRR were TTN variants, lower baseline ejection fraction, and HF admission at diagnosis. In contrast, desmosomal, nuclear envelope and motor sarcomeric gene variants were associated with a lower likelihood of LVRR. During a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 26% of patients with initial LVRR showed subsequent deterioration, which was more frequent among genotype-positive individuals (32% vs 22%, P=.054). Compared with patients with sustained LVRR, those with deterioration had worse outcomes, including higher rates of major cardiovascular events (25% vs 7%), end-stage HF (18% vs 1%), and ventricular arrhythmia (12% vs 4%) (all P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Genotype is a major determinant of both initial and long-term LVRR. Loss of ejection fraction improvement is common and strongly associated with adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayestarán et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=711). Genotype positive vs. Genotype negative was evaluated on Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR), defined by improvement in ejection fraction within 12± 6 months (p=.036). Being genotype-positive in dilated cardiomyopathy was associated with a lower rate of left ventricular reverse remodeling compared to being genotype-negative (39% vs 47%, P=.036).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: