Key result
Arrhythmogenic genes linked to ~73% lower likelihood of left ventricular reverse remodelling at 12 months.
Why the study?
The utility of combining late gadolinium enhancement and genetic testing to predict left ventricular reverse remodelling in DCM and NDLVC remains a knowledge gap.
Does the integration of CMR LGE patterns and genetic testing predict left ventricular reverse remodelling in patients with DCM and NDLVC?
Observational (n=616)
Yes
Does the integration of CMR LGE patterns and genetic testing predict left ventricular reverse remodelling in patients with DCM and NDLVC?
Odds Ratio: 0.27 (95% CI 0.12–0.6)
p-value: p=0.001
In patients with DCM and NDLVC, the presence of TTN truncating variants predicts left ventricular reverse remodeling, whereas arrhythmogenic genotypes and a ring-like LGE pattern on CMR are inversely related to recovery and predict higher arrhythmic risk.
May identify patients with lower LVRR likelihood; hypothesis-generating for integrated genetic-CMR prediction in cardiomyopathy.
AIMS: Left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR) is a prognostic marker in patients with dilated (DCM) and non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NDLVC). The utility of combining late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and genetic testing in predicting LVRR in DCM/NDLVC remains a knowledge gap. This study aimed to assess an integrated approach including LGE data and genetics to predict LVRR in DCM/NDLVC patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre observational study included DCM/NDLVC patients with: (i) baseline echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%; (ii) genetic testing; (iii) baseline cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR); (iv) 12-month follow-up echocardiographic data. LVRR was defined as LVEF increase ≥10% or LVEF ≥50% (if baseline LVEF <45%) at 12 months. Outcome measures were: (i) all-cause mortality, heart transplant, or left ventricular assist device implantation (D/HT/LVAD); (ii) sudden cardiac death or major ventricular arrhythmias (SCD/MVA). Arrhythmogenic genes studied were LMNA, DSP, FLNC, and RBM20. Among 1757 DCM/NDLVC with genetic data, 616 met eligibility (462 DCM, 154 NDLVC; age 51 ± 14 years, 34% female). LVRR occurred in 314 patients (51%): 251 (54%) in DCM and 63 (41%) in NDLVC (p = 0.004). Independent predictors of LVRR within 1 year included titin truncating variants, absence of arrhythmogenic genes, and absence of LGE ring-like pattern. In patients with LVEF <35%, only the presence of LGE ring-like pattern and arrhythmogenic genes remained independently related to a lower rate of LVRR and increased SCD/MVA risk. CONCLUSION: In a large genetically and CMR characterized DCM/NDLVC cohort, arrhythmogenic genotypes and LGE ring-like pattern were inversely related to LVRR, particularly in patients with LVEF <35%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Setti et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Dilated and non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (n=616). Arrhythmogenic genes vs. Other genes was evaluated on Left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR) at 12 months (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.60, p=0.001). Carrying arrhythmogenic genes (OR 0.27) or having an LGE ring-like pattern (OR 0.33) were independently associated with a lower likelihood of left ventricular reverse remodelling at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: