Key result
Psychosis is associated with weaker cardiovascular risk correlations, suggesting standard risk calculators may not apply.
Why the study?
Do cardiovascular risk factor associations differ between adults with psychosis and the general population?
Cross-Sectional (n=10,323)
Do cardiovascular risk factor associations differ between adults with psychosis and the general population?
Standard cardiovascular risk calculators may not be applicable for patients with treated psychosis due to weaker correlations among traditional risk factors and age.
May warrant caution applying standard CV risk calculators in psychosis; leaves open need for dedicated validation studies.
OBJECTIVE: Antipsychotic drug treatment alters status on key risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to test whether cardiovascular risk factor associations differ in adults with psychosis and adults from the general community. METHOD: Data were analysed for those aged 25-64 years from a nationally representative psychosis sample (n = 1,457) and a national comparator sample (n = 8,866). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to estimate the association among tobacco use, body mass index, waist circumference, diastolic and systolic blood pressure and fasting total-, LDL- and HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and plasma glucose. The robust Levene test was used to test for sample differences in variance. RESULTS: Correlations among cardiovascular risk indicators and between cardiovascular risk indicators and age were often significantly weaker in those with psychosis than in those from the national comparator sample. This was not due to a reduction in variance within the psychosis sample. CONCLUSIONS: Risk prediction that synthesizes multivariate risk indicator data needs to be connected to verified cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in those with psychosis to determine if standard risk calculators adequately discriminate those at high, medium and low future risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Until then the clinical implications of low or absent correlations among cardiovascular risk indicators and their low or absent association with increasing age is unclear but may indicate that risk equations commonly used in the general population may not be applicable for those with treated psychosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Foley et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Psychosis (n=10,323). Psychosis vs. Adults from the general community (national comparator sample) was evaluated on Correlations among cardiovascular risk indicators and between cardiovascular risk indicators and age. Psychosis was associated with significantly weaker correlations among cardiovascular risk indicators and age compared to a national comparator sample, suggesting standard risk calculators may not apply.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: