Key result
Health belief model education improves dietary intake, lowering cholesterol and increasing fiber in MI patients.
Why the study?
Dietary modification significantly reduces myocardial infarction mortality and recurrence, motivating an evaluation of an educational intervention based on the health belief model on dietary intake.
Does an educational intervention based on the health belief model improve dietary intake in patients with myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=72)
Randomly divided
Does an educational intervention based on the health belief model improve dietary intake in patients with myocardial infarction?
p-value: p=<0.05
An educational intervention based on the health belief model significantly improves dietary habits and health beliefs in patients recovering from a myocardial infarction.
Supports incorporating health belief model education into post-MI care; extends evidence for theory-based behavioral interventions in secondary prevention.
INTRODUCTION: Dietary modification significantly impacts reducing myocardial infarction (MI) mortality and its recurrence. This study aimed to investigate the effect of education on the dietary intake of patients with MI based on the health belief model. METHOD: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on patients with MI from October 2021 to January 2022. A total of 72 MI cases were randomly divided into intervention and control groups. The intervention group received an educational intervention based on the health belief model for three months in four sessions. The structures of the health belief model were measured using a questionnaire before the intervention and one and three months following it. Dietary intake was measured with a three-day dietary record before and after three months of the intervention. RESULTS: After the educational intervention, a significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of the average scores of awareness, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy (P<0.01). However, no significant difference was observed concerning the perceived obstacles. Although there were no significant differences between dietary intake at the baseline, the intake of energy, cholesterol, and energy percent from carbohydrate, total fat, and saturated fatty acids were lower, and fiber intake was higher in the intervention group versus the control group after the intervention (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Given the positive effect of the health belief model in this study, it is suggested to use this model for designing education for MI patients focusing on nutrition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fatahian et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Myocardial Infarction (n=72). Educational intervention based on the health belief model vs. Control group was evaluated on Dietary intake (energy, cholesterol, carbohydrate, total fat, saturated fatty acids, fiber) (p=<0.05). An educational intervention based on the health belief model significantly improved dietary intake, including lower cholesterol and higher fiber, in patients with myocardial infarction (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: