Key result
An educational intervention based on Pender’s health promotion model significantly improved lifestyle, cardiac knowledge, cholesterol, and triglycerides in patients with myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Despite advances in medical and surgical care, myocardial infarction has a high morbidity and mortality rate in Iran, requiring educational interventions based on various models.
Does an educational intervention based on Pender's health promotion model improve lifestyle and clinical outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction?
Population
Patients with myocardial infarction in Iran (n = 50 intervention, n = 50 control)
Comparison
Educational intervention based on Pender's model vs control group
Design
Randomized clinical trial
Authors
Loading...
Supports post-MI education programs; leaves open whether Pender’s model adds benefit beyond standard care in larger trials.
RCT (n=100)
Randomly allocated
Does an educational intervention based on Pender's health promotion model improve lifestyle and clinical outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction?
A structured educational intervention based on Pender's health promotion model significantly improves lifestyle behaviors, cardiac knowledge, and lipid profiles in post-myocardial infarction patients.
Moshki et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Myocardial infarction (n=100). Educational intervention based on Pender's health promotion model vs. Control group was evaluated on Lifestyle, cardiac knowledge, perceived benefits of behavior, cholesterol, and triglycerides. An educational intervention based on Pender’s health promotion model significantly improved lifestyle, cardiac knowledge, cholesterol, and triglycerides in patients with myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: