Why the study?
Increasing hospitalization rates for CAD pose challenges, and poor treatment adherence leads to treatment failure, prolonged treatment, and increased care costs.
Does an educational intervention based on Pender's Health Promotion Model improve treatment adherence in patients with coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=64)
Random allocation
No
Does an educational intervention based on Pender's Health Promotion Model improve treatment adherence in patients with coronary artery disease?
An educational intervention based on Pender's Health Promotion Model significantly improves treatment adherence in patients with coronary artery disease compared to routine education.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HPM-based education improves CAD treatment adherence versus routine care; supports integration into nursing practice.
BACKGROUND: Increasing of hospitalization rates of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) management have created major challenge for the health system. Poor adherence to treatment is one of the main reasons for treatment failure, prolongation of treatment, and increase care costs. The aim of this research was to determine the effect of educational intervention based on Pender's Health Promotion Model (HPM) on adherence in patients with CAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial was held in an educational hospital in Isfahan, Iran, February 2018-May 2019. Data were collected from 64 patients with CAD, before, 1 and 3 months after the intervention. The instrument used included treatment adherence questionnaire and a checklist Pender's HPM. The study group received dietary, exercise, and medication education based on Pender's HPM in four sessions which were held in 4 weeks. The control group received the routine educational program of the hospital. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, repeated measures ANOVA, independent t, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney tests via SPSS software. The mean (SD) of treatment adherence in the study group was 139.82 (27.44) 3 months after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Educational intervention based on Pender's HPM is more effective on treatment adherence than the routine method in the patients with CAD. It is recommended to integrate the Pender's HPM as a nursing care program for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faroughi et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (n=64). Educational intervention based on Pender's Health Promotion Model vs. Routine educational program was evaluated on Treatment adherence score at 3 months (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: