Impact of Implantation Technique on Hemodynamic Results of the Pericarbon Freedom Stentless™ Valve

BACKGROUND: The Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve has shown excellent hemodynamic results in the midterm course. However, there is no information as to whether a continuous or interrupted suture technique at the inflow site has an impact on postoperative hemodynamics. METHODS: 139 patients were enrolled in a non-randomized, prospective matched trial. An interrupted suture line technique was used in 68 patients and a continuous suture line technique was used in 71 at the inflow site. Isolated valve replacement was performed in 70.4% of the continuous and 67.6% of the interrupted suture group. Pre- and postoperative hemodynamics and one-year follow-up were obtained by echocardiography and expressed as mean and peak gradients and grade of regurgitation. RESULTS: No significant difference between continuous and interrupted suture techniques were noted with respect to mean (11.8 +/- 6.3 vs. 12.5 +/- 6.2 mm Hg, p = 0.251) and peak gradients (21.0 +/- 9.6 vs. 22.0 +/- 10.9 mm Hg, p = 0.292) as well as to the degree of regurgitation. Bypass and cross-clamping times decreased by 22.4 and 20.6 minutes, respectively, with the use of the continuous suture technique. One year follow-up showed a further, significant decrease of mean and peak gradients. CONCLUSIONS: The Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve appears to offer excellent postoperative performance. The suture line technique at the inflow site does not result in any hemodynamic differences.