Key result
Educational intervention boosts pediatric cardiologists' correct survey answers on childhood cancer survivor needs by ~15%.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in childhood cancer survivors, but little is known about paediatric cardiologists' knowledge regarding cancer treatment cardiotoxicity and how to improve it.
Does a directed educational intervention improve paediatric cardiologists' knowledge about the needs of childhood cancer survivors?
Does a directed educational intervention improve paediatric cardiologists' knowledge about the needs of childhood cancer survivors?
Absolute Event Rate: 79.2% vs 68.8%
p-value: p=0.009
A directed educational initiative significantly improved paediatric cardiologists' knowledge regarding the cardiovascular care and surveillance of childhood cancer survivors.
Supports targeted education for paediatric cardiologists; leaves open effects on surveillance practices or survivor outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in childhood cancer survivors. Cardiologists must be aware of risk factors and long-term follow-up guidelines, which have historically been the purview of oncologists. Little is known about paediatric cardiologists' knowledge regarding the cardiotoxicity of cancer treatment and how to improve this knowledge. METHODS: A total of 58 paediatric cardiologists anonymously completed a 21-question, web-based survey focused on four cardio-oncology themes: cancer treatment-related risk factors (n = 6), patient-related risk factors (n = 6), recommended surveillance (n = 3), and cardiac-specific considerations (n = 6). Following the baseline survey, a multi-disciplinary team of paediatric cardiologists and cancer survivor providers developed an in-person and web-based educational intervention. A post-intervention survey was conducted 5 months later. RESULTS: The response rate was 41/58 (70.7%) pre-intervention and 30/58 (51.7%) post-intervention. On the baseline survey, the percentage of correct answers was 68.8 ± 10.3%, which improved to 79.2 ± 16.2% after the intervention (p = 0.009). The theme with the most profound knowledge deficit was surveillance; however, it also had the greatest improvement after the intervention (49.6 ± 26.7 versus 66.7 ± 27.7% correct, p = 0.025). Individual questions with the largest per cent improvement pertained to risk of cardiac dysfunction with time since treatment (52.4 versus 93.1%, p = 0.002) and the role of dexrazoxane (48.8 versus 82.8%, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Specific knowledge deficits about the care of paediatric cancer survivors were identified amongst cardiologists using a web-based survey. Knowledge of surveillance was initially lowest but improved the most after an educational intervention. This highlights the need for cardio-oncology-based educational initiatives among paediatric cardiologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rose‐Felker et al. (2019) studied Knowledge of cardio-oncology among paediatric cardiologists (n=58). In-person and web-based educational intervention vs. Baseline (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Percentage of correct answers on a 21-question survey (p=0.009). An educational intervention significantly improved paediatric cardiologists' knowledge of childhood cancer survivor needs, increasing correct survey answers from 68.8% to 79.2% (p=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: