Key result
Gated radionuclide angiography strongly correlates with contrast left ventriculography for left ventricular volumes and LVEF.
Why the study?
Does gated radionuclide angiography accurately evaluate left ventricular volume and ejection fraction compared to contrast left ventriculography?
Observational
Does gated radionuclide angiography accurately evaluate left ventricular volume and ejection fraction compared to contrast left ventriculography?
Gated radionuclide angiography using a manual method is an accurate and reproducible technique for evaluating left ventricular volume and ejection fraction when compared to contrast ventriculography.
Supports gated radionuclide angiography for LV assessment in experienced hands; leaves open prospective validation in modern cohorts.
Gated radionuclide angiography (RVG) in orthogonal projections was used to evaluate left ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and segmental wall motion. Images of the left ventricle at end-diastole and end-systole were outlined in two projections using a simple manual method. The perimeter drawings were digitized on a desktop computer, interfaced to an XY recorder and left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction calculated. The results were compared to contrast left ventriculography (CVG) in the same projections. RVG and CVG gave similar results for end-diastolic volume (r = .87, P less than 0.001), end-systolic volume (r = .95, P less than 0.001), and ejection fraction (r = .89, P less than 0.001) over a wide range of values. In 92% of all left ventricular segments analyzed, RVG and CVG showed only minor differences in the analysis of wall motion. Reproducibility of the method by a trained observer was excellent. Interobserver trials demonstrated that less well-trained observers consistently over- or underestimated volumes, emphasizing the need for prior experience in RVG analysis. Use of this manual method for analysis of gated equilibrium RVG in orthogonal projections appears to be a reasonably accurate, reproducible method for evaluating left ventricular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenberg et al. (1980) conducted an observational in Left ventricular performance evaluation. Gated radionuclide angiography (RVG) vs. Contrast left ventriculography (CVG) was evaluated on Correlation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction between RVG and CVG (r = 0.87 to 0.95, p=<0.001). Gated radionuclide angiography strongly correlated with contrast left ventriculography for end-diastolic volume (r=0.87), end-systolic volume (r=0.95), and ejection fraction (r=0.89, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: