Key result
Permanent cardiac pacing linked to ~57% lower syncope recurrence risk in neurally mediated syncope.
Why the study?
Does permanent cardiac pacing reduce the recurrence of syncope in patients ≥ 40 years with severe asystolic neurally mediated syncope?
Observational (n=146)
Yes
Does permanent cardiac pacing reduce the recurrence of syncope in patients ≥ 40 years with severe asystolic neurally mediated syncope?
Permanent cardiac pacing significantly reduces the recurrence of syncope in patients over 40 with severe asystolic neurally mediated syncope documented by an implantable loop recorder.
May support pacing in select older patients with asystolic syncope; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
AIMS: The randomized, double-blind Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology (ISSUE-3) showed that dual-chamber permanent pacing was effective in reducing the recurrence of syncope in patients ≥ 40 years with severe asystolic, probably neurally mediated syncope (NMS), documented by implantable loop recorder (ILR). Analysis in ISSUE-3 was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. In the present study, we performed an on-treatment analysis, which included additionally those non-randomized patients followed up in the ISSUE registry to evaluate in a better manner the effectiveness of cardiac pacing therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Initially, 504 patients received an ILR, 162 (32%) patients had a diagnosis consistent with NMS within a mean observation period of 15 ± 11 months: 99 (19%) patients had documentation of syncope with ≥ 3 s asystole or ≥ 6 s asystole without syncope. Sixty patients affected by asystolic NMS received cardiac pacing therapy and 86 (33 asystolic and 53 non-asystolic NMS) were untreated; 16 patients were lost to follow-up. Paced and unpaced groups had similar clinical characteristics. During subsequent follow-up, syncope recurred in 10 paced (17%) and in 40 non-paced (46%) patients. At 21 months, the estimated product-limit syncope recurrence rates were 27% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15-47] and 54% (95% CI 43-67), respectively (P = 0.01). With cardiac pacing, the risk of recurrence was reduced by 57% (hazard ratio = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.2-0.8). Complications of pacemaker therapy were haemothorax at implantation in one patient and lead dislodgement that required correction in two patients. CONCLUSION: Permanent cardiac pacing is effective in reducing recurrence of syncope in patients ≥ 40 years with severe asystolic possible NMS with a few complications. The study shows that 61% of patients with a diagnosis of NMS made by ILR received a pacemaker but 5.1 ILRs had to be implanted to find one patient who finally had a pacemaker implanted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sutton et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Neurally mediated syncope (n=146). Cardiac pacing vs. Untreated was evaluated on Recurrence of syncope (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.2-0.8, p=0.01). Permanent cardiac pacing reduced the 21-month recurrence rate of syncope to 27% compared with 54% in untreated patients with neurally mediated syncope (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.2-0.8; P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: