Why the study?
Does a permanent pacemaker reduce syncope in patients with induced cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome?
Does a permanent pacemaker reduce syncope in patients with induced cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome?
Permanent pacemaker implantation significantly reduces the recurrence of syncope in patients with induced cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports pacemaker implantation in induced cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome; confirms syncope reduction in this RCT.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine the effect on symptoms in patients with induced cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome (ICSS) when treated or not treated with a pacemaker. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients with a history of syncope or pre-syncope and ICSS were randomized to receive a permanent pacemaker (P group, n = 30) or no pacing (NP group, n = 30). ICSS was defined as a ventricular pause (i.e. asystole) lasting 3 s or more in response to carotid sinus stimulation. The patients were seen at 3 and 12 months and at symptoms. At 12 months, the rate of syncope in the NP group was 40% (n = 12) compared with 10% (n = 3) in the P group (P = 0.008). The majority (11 of 12) of the syncope recurrences in the NP group occurred during the first 3 months. Pre-syncope occurred in two patients (7%) in the NP group and in eight (27%) in the P group. Ten patients (33%) with recurrent syncope in the NP group later crossed-over to receive pacemaker implant. CONCLUSIONS: A history of syncope or pre-syncope, plus ICSS, was a strong predictor of subsequent syncope or pre-syncope. Most of the new symptoms occurred within 3 months. Pacemaker treatment effectively reduced syncope and/or resulted in milder symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Claesson et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: