Key result
Cardiac pacing cuts fall rates ~67% in older adults with carotid sinus syndrome.
Why the study?
Retrospective and circumstantial evidence supported an overlap between symptoms of falls and syncope in older adults, prompting a prospective evaluation of cardiac pacing for falls in patients with carotid sinus syndrome.
Does cardiac pacing reduce subsequent fall and syncopal rates in older adults with unexplained falls and carotid sinus syndrome?
RCT
randomized, controlled trial
No
Does cardiac pacing reduce subsequent fall and syncopal rates in older adults with unexplained falls and carotid sinus syndrome?
Cardiac pacing reduced subsequent falls by two thirds over 1 year in older adults presenting with unexplained falls and cardioinhibitory or mixed carotid sinus hypersensitivity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports pacing in older adults with unexplained falls and carotid sinus syndrome; establishes new treatment direction from prior observational data.
Retrospective and circumstantial evidence supports an overlap between symptoms of falls and syncope in older adults. Because of this overlap, we undertook a prospective, explanatory, single-center study of cardiac pacing for falls in patients with carotid sinus syndrome in a consecutive series of over 56,000 adult visitors to an emergency department. One third attended because of a fall; one in five fallers had unexplained falls, and one third of these had carotid sinus hypersensitivity, of whom one half had a cardioinhibitory or mixed response that may be expected to respond to cardiac pacing. In a randomized, controlled trial of a subset of these patients, cardiac pacing was shown to significantly reduce subsequent fall rates by two thirds and syncopal rates during 1-year follow-up. The current pacing rate for carotid sinus syndrome is much higher in our practice than in other series because our facility is dedicated to falls and syncope in older subjects who have direct access to referring physicians and family practitioners. Of the implants in our region, 24% are for carotid sinus syndrome, compared with 43% for atrioventricular block, 20% for sick sinus syndrome, and 12% for atrial fibrillation. These rates do not include pacing in patients who fall, but rather reflect pacing rates consistent with American College of Cardiology guidelines for carotid sinus syndrome, such as recurrent syncope. These preliminary results from a local explanatory study are now being tested in a multicenter study entitled Syncope and Falls in the Elderly: Pacing and Carotid Sinus Evaluation (SAFE-PACE II).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenny et al. (2001) conducted an RCT in Carotid sinus syndrome and unexplained falls in older adults. Cardiac pacing vs. Control (unpaced) was evaluated on Subsequent fall rates and syncopal rates. Cardiac pacing significantly reduced subsequent fall rates by two thirds and syncopal rates over 1-year follow-up in older adults with carotid sinus syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: