Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An l-aromatic-amino-acid aminotransferase (AT-IA) and an l-aspartate aminotransferase (AT-IB) were partially purified from Brevibacterium linens 47 grown on l-phenylalanine as sole nitrogen source and some properties were examined. Both enzymes were active with l-aromatic amino acids and l-aspartate. AT-IA showed 6 to 12 times higher affinity and slightly higher V max for the aromatic amino acids than for aspartate. AT-IB had higher affinity for tryptophan and tyrosine than for aspartate. However, this enzyme showed 6 to 10 times higher V max for the latter than for the aromatic amino acid substrates. Both enzymes had similar pH (8·5-9·0) and temperature (37–40 °C) optima, but they differed in their molecular weights (126000 for IA and 81000 for IB) and markedly in their thermostability. At 50 °C, AT-IB was 14 times more rapidly inactivated and its inactivation rate also increased more rapidly (z-value, 7·9 °C) as the temperature increased than AT-IA (z-value, 15·5 °C). The cofactor pyridoxal-5′-phosphate was tightly bound to both enzymes. Two enzymes co-eluted on DEAE-Trisacryl M column chromatography at pH 7·5 and could be separated by chromatography on a hydroxyapatite (HA-Ultrogel) column at the same pH. Chromatography on hydroxyapatite of AT-I from cells grown on l-phenylalanine and on ammonium sulphate revealed that AT-IA was present only in phenylalanine grown cells. AT-IB was present in both extracts at similar levels, suggesting that it is constitutive. The inducibility of IA suggested that it has an in vivo catabolic role. AT-IA is probably the key enzyme for the utilization of the aromatic amino acids as sole ritrogen sources in B. linens 47.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: