Key result
Oral UFH and tinzaparin delay thrombus formation and occlusion versus saline in a rat model.
Why the study?
Does orally administered heparin prevent arterial thrombosis in a rat model?
Does orally administered heparin prevent arterial thrombosis in a rat model?
Orally administered unfractionated heparin and tinzaparin demonstrate significant antithrombotic effects in a rat model of arterial thrombosis.
Oral heparin antithrombotic activity in rats; leaves open translation to human arterial thrombosis prevention.
Our previous studies demonstrated that orally administered heparins prevent thrombosis in a rat jugular vein thrombosis model, where bovine unfractionated heparin (UFH) and the low molecular weight heparin tinzaparin reduced thrombotic incidence by 50% at 7.5 and 0.1 mg/kg, respectively. Our objectives were to determine if similar antithrombotic effects of oral heparin could be observed in an arterial thrombosis model. In this model, filter paper soaked in 30% ferric chloride was applied to the exposed rat carotid artery. A flowmeter recorded blood flow over a 60 min period determining time when the thrombus began forming (TTB) and time till occlusion (TTO). Immediately following, the thrombus was removed, dried and weighed 24 h later. Bovine UFH (7.5 mg/kg), tinzaparin (0.1 mg/kg) or saline was administered by stomach tube at 2, 5 and 25 h prior to thrombus initiation. TTB was significantly increased when UFH was given at 5 and 25 h but not 2 h prior, and when tinzaparin was given at 5 but not 2 or 25 h prior compared to rats given oral saline. TTO was significantly increased for both UFH and tinzaparin when given 5 and 25 h but not 2 h prior (one-way ANOVA). There was no difference in TTO and TTB between UFH and tinzaparin treated groups. A trend in reduction in thrombus weight was observed for UFH at 5 and 25 h prior and tinzaparin at 5 h prior to thrombus initiation (one-way ANOVA). Although no significant changes were observed in activated partial thromboplastin times, Heptest or anti-Xa activity from plasma of heparin treated rats, endothelial heparin concentrations were significantly greater than controls for UFH at 5 h and for tinzaparin at 2, 5, and 24 h. Thus, heparins administered by the oral route are effective antithrombotic agents in arterial as well as venous models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinel et al. (2004) studied Arterial thrombosis. Bovine unfractionated heparin (UFH) and tinzaparin vs. Oral saline was evaluated on Time when thrombus began forming (TTB) and time till occlusion (TTO). Orally administered unfractionated heparin and tinzaparin significantly increased the time to thrombus formation and time to occlusion in a rat arterial thrombosis model compared to saline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: