Key result
pTH-O-A fusion protein vaccine provides up to ~85% protection against FMDV infection in guinea pigs.
Why the study?
Does a recombinant bivalent vaccine protect against FMDV serotype O and A infection in guinea pigs?
Does a recombinant bivalent vaccine protect against FMDV serotype O and A infection in guinea pigs?
Recombinant bivalent vaccines pTH-O-A and pTH-O-scIgG-A elicit immune responses and provide protection against FMDV serotypes O and A in a guinea pig model.
Supports bivalent FMDV vaccine development in guinea pigs; hypothesis-generating and should not yet inform veterinary practice.
In this study, two DNA fragments encoding amino acid (141-160)-(21-140)-(141-160) of the VP1 of FMDV (foot-and-mouth disease virus) serotype O and (138-160)-(21-40)-(138-160) of the serotype A FMDV were chemically synthesized. These two tandem-repeat fragments were ligated and transfected into prokaryotic expression vector pTrcHis A to construct pTH-O-A. The other vector called pTH-O-scIgG-A was constructed similarly only that the two tandem-repeat DNA fragments were linked by the bovine-IgG heavy chain coding sequence. Guinea pigs immunized with the two bivalent vaccines pTH-O-A and pTH-O-scIgG-A showed both specific antibody activity and T cell proliferation responses. FMDV challenge tests showed that 85% and 70% of guinea pigs vaccinated twice with 200 mg of the fusion protein of pTH-O-A were protected from FMDV serotype O and serotype A infection respectively. 70% and 57% of the guinea pigs immunized with the fusion protein of pTH-O-scIgG-A were protected from FMDV serotype O and serotype A infection respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2004) studied Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) infection. Recombinant bivalent vaccines (pTH-O-A and pTH-O-scIgG-A) was evaluated on Protection from FMDV serotype O and serotype A infection. Guinea pigs vaccinated twice with 200 mg of pTH-O-A fusion protein showed 85% and 70% protection against FMDV serotype O and A infection, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: