Key result
A simplified machine learning model predicts long-term CV risk in T2D with ~95% accuracy versus QRISK3.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular risk scoring is time consuming in busy clinics, prompting an exploration of machine learning dimension reduction to decrease the required clinical inputs.
Does a machine learning model with reduced parameters accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular risk compared to the QRISK 3 score in T2DM patients without established CVD?
Observational (n=1,538)
Yes
Does a machine learning model with reduced parameters accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular risk compared to the QRISK 3 score in T2DM patients without established CVD?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A machine learning model using only 10 routinely assessed clinical parameters can accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular risk in T2DM patients, potentially saving time in busy clinical settings compared to the 21-parameter QRISK 3 score.
Background:Cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment is the cornerstone for choosing the most appropriate antihyperglycemic agent. One of the major obstacles in the use of such scores is that the process is time consuming, which is a deterrent in a busy clinic. The aim of the present analysis was to explore means of reducing the number of inputs to make the scoring faster and more acceptable to physicians.Methods:We used the MARK survey dataset to assess the utility of the QRISK 3 CV risk score in the Indian population (n=1,538); participants were recruited from five zones (east, west, north, south, and central). Machine learning techniques were used to analyze the existing MARK data. The XGBoost algorithm was used to create the model needed to identify the clinical parameters of interest. Dimension reduction techniques were employed to identify the clinical parameters of importance based on the accrued gain values. As the final step, a confusion matrix was created to assess the model’s accuracy and precision.Results:We identified ten parameters of clinical interest that could predict the 10-year CV risk and were comparable with the QRISK 3 score (with 21 parameters). The parameters identified by machine learning (ML) were age, sex, BMI, smoking status, blood pressure, treatment with antihypertensive agents, angina, total cholesterol, the total cholesterol/HDL ratio, and CKD. This dimension reduction was possible with a model accuracy of 95.12%.Conclusion:There were ten routinely assessed parameters identified with machine learning techniques that can assist physicians in determining the CV risk of T2D patients within a short period of time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosal et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes without established cardiovascular disease (n=1,538). Machine learning model (XGBoost) using 10 parameters vs. QRISK 3 score (22 parameters) was evaluated on Model accuracy in predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk. A machine learning model using 10 routinely assessed clinical parameters predicted the 10-year cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes with 95.12% accuracy compared to the 22-parameter QRISK 3 score.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: