Key result
A simplified machine learning model matches QRISK3 for ten-year CV risk prediction with ~94% accuracy.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular risk scores guide antihyperglycemic agent selection but are time-consuming to calculate, motivating exploration of dimension reduction to make scoring faster.
Does a 10-parameter machine learning model accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular risk compared to the 22-parameter QRISK 3 score in patients with type 2 diabetes without established cardiovascular disease?
Observational (n=1,538)
Yes
Does a 10-parameter machine learning model accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular risk compared to the 22-parameter QRISK 3 score in patients with type 2 diabetes without established cardiovascular disease?
A reduced 10-parameter machine learning model can accurately and rapidly assess 10-year cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes, potentially streamlining clinical workflow compared to the 22-parameter QRISK 3 score.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May simplify risk assessment in type 2 diabetes; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
Background: Cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment is the cornerstone for choosing the most appropriate antihyperglycemic agent. One of the major obstacles in the use of such scores is that the process is time-consuming, which is a deterrent in a busy clinic. The aim of the present analysis was to explore a means of reducing the number of inputs to make the scoring faster and more acceptable to physicians. Materials and Methods: We used the MARK survey dataset to assess the utility of the QRISK 3 CV risk score in the Indian population ( n = 1538); participants were recruited from five zones (east, west, north, south, and central). Machine learning (ML) techniques were used to analyze the existing MARK data. The XGBoost algorithm was used to create the model needed to identify the clinical parameters of interest. Dimension reduction techniques were employed to identify the clinical parameters of importance based on the accrued gain values. As the final step, a confusion matrix was created to assess the model's accuracy and precision. Results: We identified 10 parameters of clinical interest that could predict the 10-year CV risk and were comparable with the QRISK 3 score (with 22 parameters). The parameters identified by ML were age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, blood pressure, treatment with antihypertensive agents, angina, total cholesterol, the total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio, and chronic kidney disease. This dimension reduction was possible with a model accuracy of 94.4%. Conclusion: There were 10 routinely assessed parameters identified with ML techniques that can assist physicians in determining the CV risk of type 2 diabetes patients within a short period of time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosal et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Established Cardiovascular Disease (n=1,538). Machine learning-derived 10-parameter model vs. QRISK 3 score (22 parameters) was evaluated on Model accuracy for predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk. A machine learning model using 10 routinely assessed clinical parameters achieved 94.4% accuracy in predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk, comparable to the 22-parameter QRISK 3 score.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: