Key result
Fluosol-43 preserves ~95% of initial LV systolic pressure vs. Krebs-Henseleit buffer in isolated rat hearts.
Why the study?
Does perfusion with Fluosol-43 improve maintenance of hemodynamic and mechanical function in isolated working rat hearts compared to Krebs-Henseleit buffer?
Does perfusion with Fluosol-43 improve maintenance of hemodynamic and mechanical function in isolated working rat hearts compared to Krebs-Henseleit buffer?
Absolute Event Rate: 95.4% vs 70.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
Fluosol-43 perfluorochemical emulsion provides superior long-term support of hemodynamic and mechanical function in isolated working rat hearts compared to standard Krebs-Henseleit buffer.
Fluosol-43 perfusion merits testing in translational ex vivo models; leaves open clinical relevance for heart preservation.
Isolated working rat hearts were perfused with the perfluorochemical emulsion Fluosol-43 to determine whether it would support prolonged, stable cardiac function. The perfluorochemical emulsion provides a controlled perfusate composition, relatively high oxygen capacity, and a colloid osmotic pressure that is similar to that of plasma. Electrically paced (325 beats/min) hearts were perfused for 6 h at 35 degrees C in a recirculating system. Hemodynamic and mechanical function of seven Krebs-Henseleit-perfused hearts declined significantly more than that of seven Fluosol-43-perfused hearts over the 6-h period. The percent of initial function remaining at 6 h for Krebs-Henseleit-perfused vs. Fluosol-43-perfused hearts was 70.3 +/- 5.0 vs. 95.4 +/- 1.1% (P less than 0.001) for left ventricular peak systolic pressure; 55.6 +/- 7.7 vs. 97.5 +/- 2.4% (P less than 0.001) for dP/dtmax; 27.1 +/- 7.2 vs. 60.6 +/- 5.2% (P less than 0.005) for cardiac output; 11.0 +/- 6.3 vs. 67.2 +/- 3.4% (P less than 0.001) for external work efficiency; and 17.4 +/- 8.4 vs. 67.7 +/- 4.5% (P less than 0.001) for stroke rhythmic than Fluosol-43-perfused hearts during the last 3 h of perfusion. Perfusate lactate concentration was 4.5-fold higher in the Krebs-Henseleit perfusate than in the Fluosol-43 perfusate at 6 h, reflecting greater anaerobic metabolism in the Krebs-Henseleit-perfused hearts. Thus isolated rat hearts perfused with Fluosol-43 have greater maintenance of hemodynamic and mechanical function over a longer time period than hearts perfused with Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Segel et al. (1982) studied Isolated working rat hearts (n=14). Fluosol-43 perfluorochemical emulsion vs. Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer was evaluated on Percent of initial function remaining at 6 h for left ventricular peak systolic pressure (p=<0.001). Isolated rat hearts perfused with Fluosol-43 maintained 95.4% of initial left ventricular peak systolic pressure at 6 hours compared to 70.3% with Krebs-Henseleit buffer (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: