Key result
Perfluorochemical reperfusion restores contractile function to ~85% of baseline versus blood in isolated rabbit hearts.
Why the study?
The effects of a perfluorochemical solution on reperfusion injury in a globally ischemic heart model were assessed to explore potential improvements in cardiac function recovery.
Does reperfusion with a perfluorochemical solution improve recovery of contractile function in an isolated rabbit heart model of global ischemia?
Does reperfusion with a perfluorochemical solution improve recovery of contractile function in an isolated rabbit heart model of global ischemia?
Absolute Event Rate: 85% vs 57%
In an isolated rabbit heart model, reperfusion with a perfluorochemical solution significantly improved recovery of contractile function following global ischemia compared to whole blood.
Hypothesis-generating for perfluorochemical reperfusion in ischemia; clinical translation requires further in vivo and human studies.
We assessed the effects of a perfluorochemical solution on reperfusion injury in a globally ischemic heart model. An isolated rabbit heart, retrogradely perfused at a constant flow rate, served as our experimental model. After initial perfusion with whole blood, hearts were exposed to 30 min of normothermic global ischemia. Reperfusion was then begun with either whole blood or a 20% perfluorochemical solution (FC-43). After 120 min of reperfusion, a markedly greater recovery of contractile function was observed in the perfluorochemical-reperfused hearts (85 +/- 5% of baseline developed pressure) compared with blood-reperfused hearts (57 +/- 3% of baseline developed pressure). This recovery of function was accomplished with only 1 h of perfluorochemical reperfusion and was not lost on returning to blood perfusion. The improved recovery of function could not be attributed to the chemical composition, oxygen-carrying capacity, pH, or temperature of the perfluorochemical perfusate. Neither could the beneficial effects of perfluorochemical be related to differences in left ventricular resting pressure. We speculate that, because of marked differences in coronary resistance during reperfusion with perfluorochemical solution and blood, improved recovery of cardiac function is related to the superior rheological properties of perfluorochemicals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parrish et al. (1984) studied Postischemic reperfusion cardiac injury. 20% perfluorochemical solution (FC-43) vs. Whole blood was evaluated on Recovery of contractile function (baseline developed pressure). Reperfusion with a 20% perfluorochemical solution resulted in greater recovery of contractile function (85% of baseline developed pressure) compared with blood reperfusion (57%) in isolated rabbit hearts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: