Key result
Rescue edge-to-edge repair for suboptimal mitral repair yields ~97% 10-year freedom from reoperation and severe MR.
Why the study?
Does the rescue edge-to-edge technique provide durable results in patients with suboptimal conventional mitral valve repair?
Cohort (n=43)
Does the rescue edge-to-edge technique provide durable results in patients with suboptimal conventional mitral valve repair?
A rescue edge-to-edge repair is a rapid, effective, and durable option for addressing suboptimal results detected intraoperatively during conventional mitral valve repair.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports durability of rescue edge-to-edge repair; leaves open need for randomized trials before changing practice.
OBJECTIVES: The 'edge-to-edge' technique (EE) can be used as a bailout procedure in case of a suboptimal result of conventional mitral valve (MV) repair. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of this technique used as a rescue procedure. METHODS: From 1998 to 2011, of 3861 patients submitted to conventional MV repair for pure mitral regurgitation (MR), 43 (1.1%) underwent a rescue edge-to-edge repair for significant residual MR at the intraoperative hydrodynamic test or at the intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography. Residual MR was due to residual prolapse in 30 (69.7%) patients, systolic anterior motion in 12 (27.9%) and post-endocarditis leaflet erosion in 1 (2.3%). According to the location of the regurgitant jet, the edge-to-edge suture was performed centrally (60.5%) or in correspondence with the anterior or posterior commissure (39.5%). The original repair was left in place. RESULTS: There were no hospital deaths. Additional cross-clamp time was 15.2 ± 5.6 min. At hospital discharge, all patients showed no or mild MR and no mitral stenosis. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 97.6% complete (median length 5.7 years, up to 14.6 years). At 10 years, actuarial survival was 89 ± 7.4% and freedom from cardiac death 100%. Freedom from reoperation and freedom from MR ≥ 3+ at 10 years were both 96.9 ± 2.9%. At the last echocardiogram, MR was absent or mild in 37 patients (88%), moderate in 4 (9.5%) and severe in 1 (2.4%). No predictors for recurrence of MR ≥ 2+ were identified. The mean MV area and gradient were 2.8 ± 0.6 cm(2) and 2.7 ± 0.9 mmHg. NYHA I-II was documented in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: A 'rescue' EE can be a rapid and effective option in case of suboptimal result of 'conventional' MV repair. Long-term durability of the repair is not compromised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonis et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Significant residual mitral regurgitation after conventional mitral valve repair (n=43). Rescue edge-to-edge repair was evaluated on Freedom from reoperation and freedom from mitral regurgitation ≥ 3+ at 10 years. Rescue edge-to-edge repair for suboptimal conventional mitral valve repair yielded 96.9% freedom from reoperation and severe mitral regurgitation at 10 years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: