Key result
Oral trapidil shows no benefit over placebo for major cardiac events after PCI.
Why the study?
Does oral trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 12 months in patients undergoing PCI with or without stenting?
RCT (n=933)
Double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does oral trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 12 months in patients undergoing PCI with or without stenting?
Absolute Event Rate: 20.3% vs 18%
p-value: p=0.37
Oral trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. for 6 months did not reduce major adverse cardiac events at 1 year after PCI with or without stenting, although it reduced angiographic restenosis in a subgroup treated with balloon angioplasty alone.
Trapidil confers no MACE benefit after PCI; confirms neutral effect on clinical outcomes despite subgroup angiographic signals.
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. in preventing the occurrence of death, of myocardial infarction and the need for repeat revascularization at 12 months after balloon PTCA with or without stenting. Coronary restenosis after stenting is still a major drawback of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for 30-40% of patients. Trapidil has been shown to prevent restenosis after PTCA. Eligible patients were randomized to placebo or oral trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. at least 48 hr before PCI and continuing 6 months after a successful balloon angioplasty or stent implantation. Aspirin was given to all patients, and ticlopidine 250 mg b.i.d. to those who received a stent for 4 weeks. In a randomized subgroup of 216 patients, quantitative coronary angiography was performed also at 6-month follow-up. Out of the 933 patients enrolled, primary endpoint incidence was 20.3% in trapidil and 18.0% in placebo (P = 0.37). When recurrence or deterioration of angina was added to the combined endpoint, incidence was 27.4% in trapidil and 23.0% in placebo (P = 0.12). Restenosis rate in patients with 6-month angiography was 25.0% in trapidil arm vs. 30.1% in placebo (P = 0.43). Stent restenosis rate was similar in patients randomized to trapidil or placebo (30.2% vs. 23.8%, respectively; P = 0.44), while in patients treated with balloon angioplasty, it was lower in trapidil (17.1%) than in placebo (40.0%; P = 0.03). Oral trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. for 6 months in addition to aspirin did not influence the occurrence of major cardiac events after coronary angioplasty with or without stenting. In a prespecified subgroup of 191 patients treated with balloon angioplasty only, trapidil reduced angiographic restenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maresta et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=933). Trapidil vs. Placebo was evaluated on Death, myocardial infarction, and the need for repeat revascularization at 12 months (p=0.37). Oral trapidil 200 mg t.i.d. for 6 months did not reduce major cardiac events after coronary angioplasty with or without stenting compared to placebo (20.3% vs 18.0%; P=0.37).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: