Key result
Tranilast did not reduce the 9-month incidence of death, MI, or target vessel revascularization compared to placebo (15.5-16.1% vs 15.8%, P=0.77-0.81).
Why the study?
Does tranilast reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization in patients after successful PCI?
Population
11,484 patients enrolled within 4 hours after successful percutaneous coronary intervention of at least 1…
Comparison
Tranilast oral 300 mg or 450 mg BID for 1 or 3… vs Placebo
Design
RCT, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
Follow-up
9 months
Authors
Loading...
Tranilast confers no benefit after PCI; challenges prior limited trial suggestions of reduced restenosis.
RCT (n=11,484)
Double-blind
Randomized
Does tranilast reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization in patients after successful PCI?
p-value: p=0.77 to 0.81
Tranilast does not improve clinical or angiographic outcomes of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Holmes et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in Restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (n=11,484). Tranilast vs. Placebo was evaluated on First occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization within 9 months (p=0.77 to 0.81). Tranilast did not reduce the 9-month incidence of death, MI, or target vessel revascularization compared to placebo (15.5-16.1% vs 15.8%, P=0.77-0.81).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: