Key result
Potential FVIII:C assay calibrator reduces inter-laboratory CV in only two of five test samples.
Harmonisation of FVIII:C assay results using a potential calibrator reduced inter-laboratory variation for some, but not all, test samples.
May reduce FVIII assay variability for select samples only; leaves open utility of universal calibrators before clinical adoption.
In a Dutch project for harmonisation of factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) assays, the commutability of potential calibrators for FVIII:C was assessed by means of a 'twin-study design', which is in essence a multi-centre, split-patient sample, between-field-methods protocol. Commutability was defined as the degree to which a material yielded the same numerical relationships between results of measurements by a given set of measurement procedures as those between the expectations of the relationships for the same procedures applied to those types of material for which the procedures were intended. The study consisted of the simultaneous analysis of fresh frozen patient plasmas and three potential calibrators for FVIII:C by 16 Dutch laboratories forming eight couples. The state-of-the-art intra-laboratory standard deviation was used to assess the commutability of the potential calibrators. One potential calibrator was used to harmonise FVIII:C assay results in a Dutch field study. The inter-laboratory coefficient of variation of two test samples could be reduced significantly, but no significant effect was observed with three other test samples. We recommend that at least three different sample dilutions be used in each FVIII:C assay, in agreement with previous recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Besselaar et al. (2005) studied Factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) assay harmonization. Potential calibrators for FVIII:C was evaluated on Inter-laboratory coefficient of variation. Harmonisation of FVIII:C assay results using a potential calibrator significantly reduced the inter-laboratory coefficient of variation for two test samples, but not for three other samples.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: