Key result
Younger age linked to increased risk of radial artery spasm during coronary catheterization.
Why the study?
Radial artery spasm remains a major complication of transradial coronary artery catheterisation, prompting this evaluation of its clinical predictors and management.
What are the clinical predictors of radial artery spasm and the medications used for its prevention and management in patients undergoing transradial coronary catheterisation?
Cross-Sectional (n=169)
Yes
What are the clinical predictors of radial artery spasm and the medications used for its prevention and management in patients undergoing transradial coronary catheterisation?
Odds Ratio: 0.536 (95% CI 0.171–1.684)
p-value: p=0.005
Younger age, female sex, and a medical history of anxiety are significant clinical predictors of radial artery spasm during transradial coronary catheterisation.
May guide risk stratification for transradial access; leaves open whether targeted prophylaxis reduces spasm incidence.
Introduction The transradial approach for coronary artery catheterisation has increased in popularity compared to the transfemoral approach for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. However, radial artery spasm continues to be a major complication of the procedure. Aim To identify the predictors of radial artery spasm and the medications used for its prevention and management. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out across two tertiary hospitals in NSW, Australia. A self-administered pre-procedural survey was completed by patients undergoing coronary artery catheterisation. This survey collected socio-demographic data and assessed anxiety using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Procedural data, including length of procedure, equipment used, occurrence of radial artery spasm, and medications given, were collected post-procedure by the interventionalist. Results Of the 169 participants, over half were male (59.8%) and aged 66 years or older (56.8%). Radial artery spasm was reported in 24 (14.2%) participants. Rates of spasm were significantly higher among females (66.6%, p=0.004), those aged under 65 years (62.5%, p=0.001) and those who reported a medical history of anxiety (33.3%, p=0.0004). There were no significant differences in State and Trait anxiety scores among those who had RAS and those who did not. Logistic regression identified younger age as a statistically significant predictor of RAS (OR 0.536; 95% CI 0.171 to 1.684; p=0.005) To prevent radial artery spasm most patients received midazolam (n=158; 93.5%), nitrates (n=133; 78.7%) and/or fentanyl (n=124; 73.4%) prophylactically. Nitrates were the most frequently administered medication to treat radial artery spasm (78.7%). Conclusion This study found greater clarity around predictors for RAS is required, as identifying patients at risk can ensure prophylactic measures are implemented. This study identified nitrates as the preferred vasodilator as a preventative measure along with the use of sedation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curtis et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Patients undergoing coronary artery catheterisation (n=169). Younger age vs. Older age was evaluated on Radial artery spasm (RAS) (OR 0.536, 95% CI 0.171 to 1.684, p=0.005). Younger age was identified as a statistically significant predictor of radial artery spasm during coronary artery catheterisation (OR 0.536, 95% CI 0.171 to 1.684, p=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: