Key result
Flexible ring annuloplasty linked to ~27% greater absolute 5-year freedom from ≥moderate TR versus suture.
Why the study?
Does flexible ring tricuspid valve annuloplasty prevent postoperative tricuspid regurgitation progression compared to suture annuloplasty in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation?
Population
162 patients who underwent concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation…
Comparison
Flexible ring tricuspid valve annuloplasty using… vs Suture tricuspid valve annuloplasty using Kay or…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 5.3 ± 5.1 years
Authors
Loading...
Supports flexible over suture annuloplasty for durable TR control in mitral surgery; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
Cohort (n=162)
No
Does flexible ring tricuspid valve annuloplasty prevent postoperative tricuspid regurgitation progression compared to suture annuloplasty in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation?
Hazard Ratio: 10.66 (95% CI 3.666–31.03)
Absolute Event Rate: 88.1% vs 61.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty using flexible bands offers improved durability over suture annuloplasty for preventing postoperative tricuspid regurgitation progression in patients undergoing degenerative mitral regurgitation surgery.
Murashita et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Functional tricuspid regurgitation associated with degenerative mitral regurgitation (n=162). Ring tricuspid valve annuloplasty using a flexible band vs. Suture tricuspid valve annuloplasty was evaluated on 5-year freedom from ≥moderate tricuspid regurgitation (HR 10.66, 95% CI 3.666-31.03, p=<0.001). Concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty using flexible bands significantly improved long-term freedom from moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation compared to suture annuloplasty.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: