PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2026Energy & Fuels3 citationsOpen Access

Lithological Control of Gas Hydrate Saturation Determined by Pressure Core Analysis in Subpermafrost Reservoirs of the Alaska North Slope (HYDRATE-02 Geo Data Well)

View Full Paper
SPStephen C. PhillipsWWWilliam F. WaiteJYJun Yoneda

Key Points

  • Quantify gas hydrate saturation and evaluate how reservoir lithology governs gas hydrate distribution in subpermafrost sand units.
  • Analyzed 53 pressure core sections recovered from the B1 and D1 hydrate-bearing sand reservoirs and bounding seal sediments.
  • Measured gas hydrate saturation via quantitative degassing through controlled depressurization.
  • Characterized lithologic properties using P-wave velocity, gamma ray attenuation density, X-ray computed tomography, and grain size analysis.
  • Gas hydrate saturation reached 68% to 91% in silty fine sands of the B1 reservoir and 53% to 73% in sandy silt to silty fine sands of the D1 reservoir.
  • Overlying fine-grained seal sediments and basal transitional units exhibited low saturation (0% to 13% and <10%, respectively), indicating minimal methane transport across lithologic boundaries.
  • Hydrate saturation correlated positively with median grain size, sand content, and porosity, while depressurization measurements confirmed brackish pore water salinity during dissociation.

Abstract

Abstract Quantitatively degassing pressure cores by controlled depressurization is a key approach to characterizing gas hydrate reservoirs by measuring the gas hydrate saturation (Sh) of sediments. We measured Sh for 53 core sections from the Alaska North Slope during the JOGMEC-DOE-USGS Collaborative Gas Hydrate R&D Project in Alaska, from subpermafrost sediments that were later subjected to an extended-duration gas production test. We characterized lithologic influences on Sh using physical property core scans (P-wave velocity, gamma ray attenuation density, and X-ray computed tomography) and grain size measurements. Pressure cores were recovered from the Hydrate-02 Geo Data Well (GDW) at the Kuparuk State 7-11-12 site through two hydrate-bearing sand reservoirs, the B1 and D1 sands, and their finer-grained bounding sediments. Sh reaches very high values (68 to 91% of the pore space) in silty fine sands within the B1 sand, which also contains two lower P-wave velocity intervals (one measured at 30% Sh) within the main reservoir. Sh and grain sizes of the B1 sand are generally higher than the D1 sand, which hosts high Sh (53 to 73%) within its sandy silt to silty fine sands. The heterogeneous silty clay to silt “seal” sediments directly overlying both reservoirs have low Sh (0 to 13%) even in thin, coarser beds, suggesting minimal methane transport between the reservoir and seal. Sh decreases with depth downward toward the base of both the D1 and B1 sands, corresponding to decreasing grain size. These transitions are underlain by silty clay to clayey silt sediments with low Sh (<10%), similar to the seal sediments. Slow depressurization was used to estimate a brackish salinity based on the pressure and temperature of the onset of hydrate dissociation for two core sections within the B1 sand. We show that Sh increases with median grain size, sand content, and porosity but exhibits some variation within the sand beds that is not directly explained by lithology.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Phillips et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa51e69327956e4761f8471https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c04960
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper