Key result
Priority Setting Partnership identifies top 10 research priorities in spinal muscular atrophy, including neuromuscular regeneration.
Why the study?
Advances in medicines have transformed spinal muscular atrophy care, yet many needs remain unmet, requiring alignment of research priorities with patient, caregiver, and healthcare professional lived experiences.
This initiative identified the top 10 community-driven research priorities for spinal muscular atrophy to guide future research and funding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“In just two decades we've moved from trying to understand the basic biology of SMA to delivering truly transformative, disease-modifying therapies—and now to exploring combination approaches that recognise SMA as a complex, multi-system condition across the whole lifespan. All made possible by a constant dialogue between researchers, clinicians, industry and the community. That keeps the science ambitious and firmly grounded in the real needs of the community.”
“SMA is a condition that has three disease-modifying treatments on the several markets, but still we also need to spread the message: SMA is not cured”
“The outcomes of this project will ensure that research efforts address the needs of the community”
Directs research funding to patient-identified SMA priorities; leaves open translation into clinical therapies pending validation studies.
Background Advances in medicines have transformed the outlook for people living with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), yet many needs remain unmet. As the scientific and clinical environment evolves, aligning research priorities with the lived experience of patients is increasingly recognised as essential to ensure that investment delivers meaningful, community-relevant impact. While academic and industry agendas have yielded breakthroughs, incorporating patient and caregiver perspectives can further shape the fundamental and clinical research landscape. This project aimed to (1) identify the “Top 10” unanswered research questions in SMA from the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals; (2) engage the wider research and clinical community to further refine these priorities through expert dialogue; and (3) disseminate the outcomes to raise awareness, establish a feedback loop with the community, and stimulate research and funding activity. More broadly, it aimed to illustrate how participatory approaches can inform rare disease research agendas. SMA Europe led a multinational Priority Setting Partnership using the James Lind Alliance approach. Over 900 participants from 22 countries submitted research priorities, which were consolidated and ranked through surveys and a final consensus workshop to produce a community-defined “Top 10”. In subsequent phases, a transdisciplinary expert workshop was convened to identify research areas with the highest potential impact and a dissemination campaign was launched, promoting uptake among researchers and funders. Results The “Top 10” priorities grouped into eight research clusters, ranked by importance: 1. Regeneration of neuromuscular system; 2. Biomarkers; 3. Metabolism and diet; 4. (Personalised) Physiotherapy; 5. Understanding SMA impact on pathways, cells and tissues; 6. Bones and joints; 7. Finding solutions to manage fatigue; 8. Innovative technology. While some align with current research, others highlight underexplored areas central to quality of life. The participatory process demonstrated the role of patient organisations as conveners and co-creators in shaping research strategy. Conclusions This initiative represents the first European-wide, patient-led initiative to define research priorities in SMA and reflects a growing shift toward inclusive governance in rare disease research, beyond Europe alone. By grounding biomedical innovation in community-defined priorities, it illustrates a replicable model for participatory research and transdisciplinary collaboration. SMA Europe is using the identified priorities to guide its research strategy and encourages researchers and funders to consider them in future initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gusset et al. (2026) studied Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) (n=900). Priority Setting Partnership was evaluated on Top 10 unanswered research questions in SMA. A Priority Setting Partnership involving over 900 participants identified the top 10 research priorities in spinal muscular atrophy, including neuromuscular regeneration and biomarkers.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: