Why the study?
Data on heart failure phenotypes in India remain limited.
Population
1,207 adult HF outpatients with documented EF at centres across India
Comparison
HFrEF vs HFmrEF vs HFpEF
Design
Multicentre retrospective cross-sectional analysis
Key result
Higher BMI (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.10-1.65) and systolic blood pressure (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.37-1.60) were associated with higher odds of HFpEF in Indian outpatients.
Authors
Loading...
Findings in Indian outpatients should not yet change practice; extends evidence to South Asian cohorts and remains hypothesis-generating.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,207)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 1.35 (95% CI 1.1–1.65)
In an Indian outpatient cohort, HFpEF was associated with higher BMI, higher systolic blood pressure, and stroke, while HFrEF was associated with higher NT-proBNP and diabetes.
Sharma et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=1,207). Higher body mass index (per 5 kg/m2) was evaluated on Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotype (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.65). Higher BMI (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.10-1.65) and systolic blood pressure (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.37-1.60) were associated with higher odds of HFpEF in Indian outpatients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: