Key result
Large-bore mechanical thrombectomy shows 100% technical success and improved RV/LV ratio in higher-risk PE.
Why the study?
To evaluate the clinical outcomes, efficacy, and safety of catheter-directed large-bore mechanical thrombectomy in patients with intermediate-high-risk and high-risk pulmonary embolism.
Does catheter-directed large-bore mechanical thrombectomy improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism?
Observational (n=24)
No
Does catheter-directed large-bore mechanical thrombectomy improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large-bore mechanical thrombectomy is a feasible and safe therapeutic option that rapidly improves hemodynamics in patients with intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical outcomes, efficacy, and safety of catheter-directed large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (LBMT) in patients with intermediate-high-risk and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: This retrospective single-centre case series included 24 patients with acute PE treated with LBMT between August 2021 and November 2024 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Patients were classified into intermediate-high-risk and high-risk PE. Clinical data, imaging, procedural characteristics, and follow-up outcomes were collected. Primary outcomes included technical success, early clinical improvement, and changes in right ventricular (RV) function. Secondary outcomes comprised 30-day all-cause mortality, intensive care unit admission, procedural complications, and access site events. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients (8 intermediate-high-risk and 16 high-risk PE) were included of which 9 (38%) presented with cardiac arrest and 7 required veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. LBMT was technically successful in all patients (100%) and early clinical improvement within 48 hours was observed in 71%. The RV/left ventricular ratio decreased after LBMT (from 1.8 ± 0.7 to 1.1 ± 0.4, p = 0.0002) and RV function improved. No device-related deaths or cardiac injuries occurred. Three patients (13%) died within 30 days, all of whom presented with cardiac arrest. CONCLUSIONS: LBMT was feasible and safe in a real-world cohort of intermediate-high-risk and high-risk PE patients, including those with PE-induced cardiac arrest or contraindications to thrombolysis. The procedure was associated with rapid clinical improvement and favourable hemodynamic outcomes, with a low rate of major complications. These findings support the use of LBMT as an alternative therapeutic option in selected PE patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dragsbæk et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Intermediate-high-risk and high-risk pulmonary embolism (n=24). Catheter-directed large-bore mechanical thrombectomy (LBMT) was evaluated on Technical success, early clinical improvement, and changes in right ventricular (RV) function. Large-bore mechanical thrombectomy achieved 100% technical success and reduced the RV/left ventricular ratio from 1.8 to 1.1 in patients with intermediate-high and high-risk PE.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: