Key result
Cardiometabolic abnormalities, not obesity alone, are linked to ~21% higher odds of subclinical atherosclerosis.
Why the study?
The underlying relationship between BMI, cardiometabolic disorders, and subclinical atherosclerosis is poorly understood.
Is there an association between body size phenotypes, cardiometabolic abnormalities, and subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic middle-aged subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=3,909)
Is there an association between body size phenotypes, cardiometabolic abnormalities, and subclinical atherosclerosis in asymptomatic middle-aged subjects?
Odds Ratio: 1.04 (95% CI 0.9–1.19)
Subclinical atherosclerosis is primarily driven by the coexistence of cardiometabolic risk factors rather than BMI alone, highlighting the importance of metabolic health over simple weight categorization.
May warrant metabolic health assessment over BMI alone for atherosclerosis risk; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
CONTEXT: The underlying relationship between body mass index (BMI), cardiometabolic disorders, and subclinical atherosclerosis is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between body size phenotypes and subclinical atherosclerosis. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Cardiovascular disease-free cohort. PARTICIPANTS: Middle-aged asymptomatic subjects (n = 3909). A total of 6 cardiometabolic body size phenotypes were defined based on the presence of at least 1 cardiometabolic abnormality (blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) and based on BMI: normal-weight (NW; BMI <25), overweight (OW; BMI = 25.0-29.9) or obese (OB; BMI >30.0). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subclinical atherosclerosis was evaluated by 2D vascular ultrasonography and noncontrast cardiac computed tomography. RESULTS: For metabolically healthy subjects, the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis increased across BMI categories (49.6%, 58.0%, and 67.7% for NW, OW, and OB, respectively), whereas fewer differences were observed for metabolically unhealthy subjects (61.1%, 69.7%, and 70.5%, respectively). When BMI and cardiometabolic abnormalities were assessed separately, the association of body size phenotypes with the extent of subclinical atherosclerosis was mostly driven by the coexistence of cardiometabolic risk factors: adjusted OR = 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-1.19) for OW and OR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.88-1.30) for OB in comparison with NW, whereas there was an increasing association between the extent of subclinical atherosclerosis and the number of cardiometabolic abnormalities: adjusted OR = 1.21 (95% CI, 1.05-1.40), 1.60 (95% CI, 1.33-1.93), 1.92 (95% CI, 1.48-2.50), and 2.27 (95% CI, 1.67-3.09) for 1, 2, 3, and >3, respectively, in comparison with noncardiometabolic abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis varies across body size phenotypes. Pharmacologic and lifestyle interventions might modify their cardiovascular risk by facilitating the transition from one phenotype to another.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosselló et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical atherosclerosis (n=3,909). Body size phenotypes and cardiometabolic abnormalities vs. Normal-weight and no cardiometabolic abnormalities was evaluated on Extent of subclinical atherosclerosis (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.19). The extent of subclinical atherosclerosis was driven by the number of cardiometabolic abnormalities (OR 1.21 for 1 vs 0) rather than overweight (OR 1.04) or obesity (OR 1.07) alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: