Key result
Impaired metabolic health (std. ß 0.13, P=0.02) and lower cardiorespiratory fitness (std. ß -0.21, P=0.002) independently determined increased carotid intima-media thickness in obese subjects.
Why the study?
It remained unknown whether impaired metabolic health and reduced cardiorespiratory fitness relate to cardiovascular disease independently of each other across normal weight, overweight, and obese individuals.
Observational (n=421)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.59% vs 0.52%
p-value: p=<0.05
Impaired metabolic health and low cardiorespiratory fitness are independent determinants of subclinical atherosclerosis in obese individuals, with low fitness partially explaining the increased cardiovascular risk in metabolically healthy obesity.
Low fitness and impaired metabolic health may drive subclinical atherosclerosis in obesity; hypothesis-generating for prospective intervention trials.
CONTEXT: For a given body mass index (BMI), both impaired metabolic health (MH) and reduced cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) associate with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). OBJECTIVE: It remains unknown whether both risk phenotypes relate to CVD independently of each other, and whether these relationships differ in normal weight, overweight, and obese subjects. METHODS: Data from 421 participants from the Tübingen Diabetes Family Study, who had measurements of anthropometrics, metabolic parameters, CRF (maximal aerobic capacity [VO2max]) and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), an early marker of atherosclerosis, were analyzed. Subjects were divided by BMI and MH status into 6 phenotypes. RESULTS: In univariate analyses, older age, increased BMI, and a metabolic risk profile correlated positively, while insulin sensitivity and VO2max negatively with cIMT. In multivariable analyses in obese subjects, older age, male sex, lower VO2max (std. ß -0.21, P = 0.002) and impaired MH (std. ß 0.13, P = 0.02) were independent determinants of increased cIMT. After adjustment for age and sex, subjects with metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) had higher cIMT than subjects with metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW; 0.59 ± 0.009 vs 0.52 ± 0.01 mm; P < 0.05). When VO2max was additionally included in this model, the difference in cIMT between MHO and MHNW groups became statistically nonsignificant (0.58 ± 0.009 vs 0.56 ± 0.02 mm; P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that impaired MH and low CRF independently determine increased cIMT in obese subjects and that low CRF may explain part of the increased CVD risk observed in MHO compared with MHNW.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehn‐Stefan et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Obesity and subclinical atherosclerosis (n=421). Metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) vs. Metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW) was evaluated on Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) (p=<0.05). Impaired metabolic health (std. ß 0.13, P=0.02) and lower cardiorespiratory fitness (std. ß -0.21, P=0.002) independently determined increased carotid intima-media thickness in obese subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: