Key result
Laparoscopic surgery plus enhanced recovery reduces morbidity vs conventional open surgery, cutting wound infections ~86%.
Why the study?
Does the combination of laparoscopy and an enhanced recovery protocol improve surgical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer?
RCT (n=466)
randomly allocated
Does the combination of laparoscopy and an enhanced recovery protocol improve surgical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer?
The combination of laparoscopic surgery with an enhanced recovery program provides better treatment results and lower morbidity in patients with colorectal cancer.
May support combined laparoscopic-enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal cancer; hypothesis-generating and requires validation in prospective RCTs.
AIM to assess the efficacy of combination of laparoscopy and protocol of enhanced recovery in patients with colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between 2008-2016 466 patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Of them 266 of received perioperative treatment according to enhanced recovery protocol, 191 had routibne open procedure (group 2) and, 75 had laparoscopic operation (group 1). Patients underwent the following procedures: right hemicolectomy (n=53), left hemicolectomy (n=32), sigmoidectomy (n=55), abdomeno-perineal excision (n=67) and low anterior resection of rectum(n=201), other operation - 58. The following variables were analized: operating time, intraoperative blood loss, time of first flatus and defecation, morbidity (wound infections, anastomotic leakage, peritonitis, postoperative ileus, urinary disorders, thrombosis, cardiopulmonary complications). RESULTS. Groups were comparable in gender, comorbidities, body mass index, types of operations. Operating time did not differ significantly between 3 groups. Intraoperative blood loss was higher in conventional group. The time offirstflatus and defecation were better in group 1 and 2. Mortality rate was similar. Morbidity was lower in group 1 and 2 compared with conventional group: wound infections 1,3%, 3,1% vs 9%, anastomotic leakage 4%, 5,5% vs 9%, ileus 1,2 vs 5,4%, peritonitis 2,6%, 1,5% and 3,5%, bowel obstruction caused by the adhesions 0%, 6,8% vs 5,5%. Reoperation rate was 4%, 4,7% vs 5,5%, consequemntly. CONCLUSION. Combination of laparoscopic surgery withenhanced recovery program provides better results of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zitta et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in colorectal cancer (n=466). Laparoscopy with enhanced recovery protocol vs. Conventional open procedure was evaluated on Morbidity (wound infections, anastomotic leakage, peritonitis, postoperative ileus, urinary disorders, thrombosis, cardiopulmonary complications). Laparoscopic surgery combined with an enhanced recovery program reduced morbidity compared to conventional open surgery, including lower rates of wound infections (1.3% vs 9%) and anastomotic leakage (4% vs 9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: