Key result
Direct placement of 4G smartphones over contemporary ICDs causes no electromagnetic interference.
Why the study?
Does exposure to modern 4G smartphones cause electromagnetic interference in patients with contemporary implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Does exposure to modern 4G smartphones cause electromagnetic interference in patients with contemporary implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Modern 4G smartphones pose a low risk of electromagnetic interference with contemporary ICDs, suggesting that current manufacturer recommendations for a 15 cm separation may be outdated.
Suggests low EMI risk from 4G smartphones near contemporary ICDs; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change separation guidelines.
AIMS: Manufacturers of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) recommend that cell phones be maintained at a distance of ∼15 cm from the implanted device in order to avoid risk of dysfunction due to electromagnetic interference (EMI). Data relating to this issue are outdated and do not reflect modern technology. Our aim was to evaluate whether EMI is still an issue with contemporary ICDs and smartphones. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients implanted with a wireless-enabled ICD were tested for potential interference with two models of recent 4G smartphones in conditions intended to maximize risk of EMI. A magnet effect (due to the phone speakers) was tested by placing the smartphones in the standby mode directly over the ICD generator. The presence of EMI artefacts on the real-time electrograms was evaluated by placing the smartphones in the standby, dialling, and operating modes directly over the generator casing and over the parasternal region in the vicinity of the ventricular lead. A total of 63 patients equipped with 29 different models of single, dual, or biventricular ICDs from five major manufacturers were included. None of the patients showed any evidence of interference with the smartphones during any of the 882 tests. CONCLUSION: The risk of EMI between modern smartphones and contemporary ICDs is low. This is probably due to the filters incorporated in the ICDs and low emission by the phones, as well as the small size of the magnets in the smartphones tested. STUDY REGISTRATION: NCT02330900 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burri et al. (2016) studied Implanted with a wireless-enabled ICD (n=63). 4G smartphones was evaluated on Evidence of electromagnetic interference (magnet effect or EMI artefacts). Placement of 4G smartphones directly over the generator or parasternal region in 63 patients with contemporary ICDs caused no electromagnetic interference across 882 tests.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: