Key result
CRT reduces mortality and improves LV function vs medical therapy in severe HF with dyssynchrony.
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve outcomes in patients with severe, drug-refractory heart failure and signs of intraventricular dyssynchrony?
Population
Patients with severe, drug-refractory heart failure and signs of intraventricular dyssynchrony
Comparison
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs Optimized medical therapy alone
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
May support CRT in severe HF with dyssynchrony; leaves open optimal selection and programming.
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve outcomes in patients with severe, drug-refractory heart failure and signs of intraventricular dyssynchrony?
This review summarizes evidence that CRT reduces morbidity and mortality in symptomatic heart failure patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony, while highlighting ongoing challenges in patient selection and device programming.
Sticherling et al. (2006) conducted a review in chronic heart failure. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) vs. optimised medical therapy alone was evaluated. Cardiac resynchronisation therapy reduces overall mortality, improves symptoms, exercise tolerance, and left ventricular function compared with optimised medical therapy alone in patients with severe heart failure and intraventricular dyssynchrony.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: