This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Study Subject: The study focuses on the anesthetic efficacy of 2 ml of 20 mg/ml (2%) articaine solution (Joint-stock company «Binergia») compared with 2 ml of 20 mg/ml (2%) lidocaine hydrochloride solution. Objective: To perform a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of conduction anesthesia of the third branch of the trigeminal nerve using articaine- and lidocaine-based local anesthetics. Methodology: Patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups of 20 each. The first group received 2 ml injections of 20 mg/ml articaine hydrochloride solution, while the second group was administered 2 ml of 20 mg/ml lidocaine hydrochloride solution. The primary indication for local anesthesia was ICD-10 code K10.2: Inflammatory diseases of the jaws (periostitis). Local anesthetic dosages did not exceed half the maximum allowable dose for each patient, considering individual body weight. The main efficacy endpoints included • Level of analgesia measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) within 10 minutes of anesthetic administration; • Onset time of anesthesia, defined as the moment of loss of pain sensitivity within the area of innervation; • Duration of analgesia, measured from the onset of anesthesia to the return of sensitivity. Results: The study demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of both local anesthetic solutions—20 mg/ml (2%) lidocaine and 20 mg/ml (2%) articaine — for conduction anesthesia in patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases of the maxillofacial region. For deep inflammatory foci, 20 mg/ml (2%) articaine is preferable. For short-term procedures, especially in patients with specific risk factors, utilization of 20 mg/ml (2%) lidocaine may be appropriate. Conclusions: 1. Administration of 20 mg/ml (2%) lidocaine solution for local anesthesia in the presence of inflammation provides a moderate reduction in VAS scores, likely due to its anti-inflammatory properties. 2. The use of 20 mg/ml (2%) lidocaine hydrochloride solution offers reliable anesthesia and assists in inflammation control, thus improving postoperative outcomes as observed during the postoperative period. 3. It was found that 20 mg/ml (2%) lidocaine hydrochloride has a shorter duration of action (125 ± 14 min) compared to 20 mg/ml (2%) articaine hydrochloride (175 ± 23 min), which is an important consideration when planning postoperative care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiunova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: