Key result
Nursing home OAC use is ~22% lower in women, alongside racial and cognitive disparities.
Why the study?
Anticoagulant prescribing decisions in nursing homes are challenging due to advanced age and clinical complexity, and prior utilization studies focused on specific indications or community-dwelling populations.
What is the prevalence of and factors associated with oral anticoagulant use among US nursing home residents?
Cross-Sectional (n=506,482)
Yes
What is the prevalence of and factors associated with oral anticoagulant use among US nursing home residents?
Approximately one in eight US nursing home residents use oral anticoagulants, with lower use observed among women, non-white residents, and those with cognitive impairment or limited life expectancy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Disparities in oral anticoagulant use among nursing home residents warrant attention; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve equity and appropriateness.
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Anticoagulants are indicated for treatment and prevention of several clinical conditions. Prior studies have examined anticoagulant utilization for specific indications and in community-dwelling populations. Decision-making regarding anticoagulant prescribing in the nursing home setting is particularly challenging because advanced age and clinical complexity places most residents at increased risk for adverse drug events. To estimate the prevalence of oral anticoagulant (OAC) use (overall, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)) and identify factors associated with oral anticoagulant use among the general population of residents living in nursing homes. METHODS: This point prevalence study was conducted among 506,482 residents in US nursing homes on 31 October 2016 who were enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service. Covariates including demographics, clinical conditions, medications, cognitive impairment and functional status were obtained from Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments and Medicare Part A and D claims. Oral anticoagulant use was identified using dispensing dates and days supply information from Medicare Part D claims. Robust Poisson models estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for associations between covariates and 1) any anticoagulant use, and 2) DOAC versus warfarin use. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: -VASc risk ischaemic stroke scores, had a higher prevalence of oral anticoagulant use. Women (aPR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.76-0.79), residents with limited life expectancy (aPR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.76-0.83), those with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment (aPR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.65-0.68), those using NSAIDs or antiplatelets, and non-white racial/ethnic groups had a lower prevalence of anticoagulant use. Residents with higher levels of polypharmacy, BMI and age had a lower prevalence of DOAC use (versus warfarin). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Approximately one in eight general nursing home residents use oral anticoagulants and among oral anticoagulant users, only slightly more residents used warfarin than DOACs. The lower prevalence of anticoagulation among women and non-white racial/ethnic groups raises concerns of potential inequities in quality of care. Lower oral anticoagulant use among residents with limited life expectancy suggests possible deprescribing at the end of life. Further research is needed to inform resident-centred shared decision-making that explicitly considers treatment goals and individual-specific risks and benefits of anticoagulation at all stages of the medication use continuum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Nursing home residents (n=506,482). Female sex (as a factor associated with OAC use) vs. Male sex was evaluated on Prevalence of oral anticoagulant use (aPR 0.78, 95% CI 0.76-0.79). Among US nursing home residents, approximately 1 in 8 used oral anticoagulants, with lower prevalence observed in women, non-white residents, and those with cognitive impairment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: