Key result
Although overall OAC prevalence increased to 46.6% by 2019, each decade of ascending age was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving OACs among VA nursing home residents.
Why the study?
Following the 2014 ACC/AHA guideline shift from aspirin to oral anticoagulants for AF stroke prevention, the prevalence and predictors of OAC and aspirin use among veterans in VA nursing homes were unknown.
What are the prevalence and predictors of oral anticoagulant use among Veterans Affairs nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2?
Observational (n=4,994)
Yes
What are the prevalence and predictors of oral anticoagulant use among Veterans Affairs nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2?
Despite increases in guideline-concordant oral anticoagulant use for atrial fibrillation in VA nursing homes since 2014, significant underutilization persists, particularly among older, frail, and racially minoritized residents.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Age-related OAC underuse in VA nursing homes warrants monitoring for undertreatment; leaves open equity-focused interventions in frail AF residents.
OBJECTIVES In 2014, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association moved away from recommending aspirin in atrial fibrillation (AF) and recommended that patients be treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) to mitigate the risk of stroke. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of OACs and/or aspirin use among veterans with AF in Veterans Affairs nursing homes in the era after the guideline publication. DESIGN Observational study of veterans admitted from October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2019. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Four thousand nine hundred ninety-four nursing home residents with AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2. METHODS Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare demographics, comorbidities, functional status, and concurrent antiplatelet medication use in residents who received OAC ± aspirin and aspirin alone, compared with neither. RESULTS In the era after the 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline was released, age-standardized prevalence rates for any OAC (warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant) increased from 31.2% in fiscal year (FY) 2013 to 2014 to 46.6% in FY 2019. In addition, there was a decrease in patients receiving no OAC (21.1%-16.2%) and aspirin (47.7%-39.3%). However, some eligible residents remained untreated. Averaged over FY 2015 to 2019, each decade of ascending age was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving OAC [relative risk ratio (RRR), 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.87], relative to neither anticoagulant nor aspirin use. Black veterans were less likely to receive OAC (RRR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.91); Hispanic veterans were less likely to receive OAC (RRR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.91) and aspirin (RRR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.72). Mild to moderate cognitive impairment, greater disability, and other antiplatelet use were also associated with less OAC use. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Fewer Veterans Affairs nursing home residents received OACs than recommended by guidelines, with significant differences by age and race/ethnicity. Future research efforts should aim to understand the reasons for low OAC use and to augment the evidence base for anticoagulant use to include frail older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manja et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=4,994). Ascending age (per decade) vs. Younger age was evaluated on Receipt of oral anticoagulants (OAC) relative to neither OAC nor aspirin (RRR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.87). Although overall OAC prevalence increased to 46.6% by 2019, each decade of ascending age was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving OACs among VA nursing home residents.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: