Key result
Oral diazepam and chlorphenamine premedication fails to reduce periprocedural pain or anxiety versus no premedication.
Why the study?
Does oral premedication with diazepam and chlorphenamine reduce anxiety and pain perception in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
RCT (n=200)
Open-label
alternating weekdays
No
Does oral premedication with diazepam and chlorphenamine reduce anxiety and pain perception in patients undergoing coronary angiography?
Routine premedication with oral diazepam and chlorphenamine before coronary angiography does not improve patient anxiety or pain perception and may increase local pain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support routine premedication before cardiac catheterization; challenges assumptions of benefit and supports reevaluation of guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Premedication with benzodiazepines has been thought to reduce patient anxiety, pain perception, and non-catheter-induced coronary spasms and may increase procedure-related complications. We used to routinely provide premedication with diazepam and chlorpheniramine before cardiac catheterization procedures. However the benefits of such a treatment are not well established here. Therefore, we designed this study to test whether the routine use of premedication during coronary angiography is needed. METHODS: A total of 200 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo either diagnostic or therapeutic coronary angiographic procedures were randomized to receive either premedication with diazepam (5 mg) and chlorpheniramine (4 mg) 60 minutes prior to their procedures (n = 100) or no premedication (n = 100). The administration of intravenous midazolam during the procedures was permitted at the operator's discretion. The primary endpoints were anxiety and pain perception during the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients with similar baseline characteristics were randomized into two groups. The first group received oral premedication with diazepam (5 mg) and chlorphenamine (4 mg) 60 minutes prior to their procedures, and the other group did not receive premedication. We observed no differences in periprocedural pain perception (31% in the premedicated group versus 29% in the non-premedicated group; P = 0.75) or anxiety (59% in the premedicated group versus 50% in the non-premedicated group; P = 0.2). Interestingly, local pain was more pronounced in the premedicated patients than in the non-premedicated patients (30% versus 16%, respectively; P = 0.018). There were no contrast-related reactions reported in either group. CONCLUSION: Treatment with oral diazepam and chlorphenamine prior to cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention does not alter rates of anxiety, periprocedural pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alamri (2011) conducted an RCT in stable patients undergoing diagnostic or interventional cardiac catheterization (n=200). Diazepam and chlorphenamine vs. no premedication was evaluated on periprocedural pain perception (p=0.75). Oral premedication with diazepam and chlorphenamine prior to cardiac catheterization did not significantly alter rates of periprocedural pain (31% vs 29%) or anxiety (59% vs 50%) compared to no premedication.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: