Key result
Aortic and mitral surgery links to 6.9% in-hospital mortality, worsened by age, low BMI, and CABG.
Observational (n=1,167)
Yes
In patients undergoing concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery, preoperative patient-related factors such as advanced age, smaller BMI, and need for CABG are the major determinants of survival, whereas the choice of mitral valve replacement versus repair does not significantly affect 5-year outcomes.
May inform preoperative risk counseling for double-valve surgery; leaves open mitral repair versus replacement effects on survival.
OBJECTIVES: There are limited reliable data on the long-term survival of patients operated upon with double-valve surgery (DVS) in the literature. In this study, in-hospital mortality and 5-year survival were determined and the potential risk factors for increased mortality were identified and discussed. METHODS: This is a report of an observational retrospective study of 1167 patients undergoing concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery from 2002 to 2011. Data were prospectively collected in a regional database from Emilia-Romagna (Italy). RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality rate for DVS was 6.9%. Both in-hospital and 1-year mortality were statistically significant between age groups. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher for patients with a smaller body mass index (BMI), for those who had concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and those who received mitral valve replacement (MVR) instead of plasty (MVP). In-hospital and 1-year mortality were highest in patients ≥70 who had implantation of mitral and aortic mechanical valves. There were significant differences in 5-year follow-up survival according to age, BMI and concomitant CABG. The choice of MVR and MVP did not affect 5-year survival. Multivariable analysis showed that patient-related factors appear to be the major determinant of late survival, irrespective of the type of operation or other intraoperative variables. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age, smaller BMI and concomitant CABG are significant risk factors for mortality in DVS. MVP provided comparable 5-year outcomes with MVR. Multivariable analysis demonstrates that preoperative and clinical patient-related factors are the real burden in the successful treatment of patients undergoing double-valve procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolini et al. (2014) conducted an observational in concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery (n=1,167). Concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery was evaluated on In-hospital mortality. Concomitant aortic and mitral valve surgery was associated with an overall in-hospital mortality of 6.9%, with advanced age, smaller BMI, and concomitant CABG acting as significant risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: