Key result
Exercise echocardiography is linked to no adverse events versus a ~29% rate with DSE.
Why the study?
Exercise echocardiography and dobutamine stress echocardiography are widely applied non-invasive methods with different clinical procedures and indications for assessing CAD.
How does exercise echocardiography compare to dobutamine stress echocardiography in safety and utility for assessing suspected or known coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=260)
No
How does exercise echocardiography compare to dobutamine stress echocardiography in safety and utility for assessing suspected or known coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 29%
Exercise echocardiography is a safer non-invasive imaging method for patients capable of exercise, while dobutamine stress echocardiography remains beneficial for viability assessment and patients unable to exercise.
May favor exercise echocardiography for safety when feasible; observational data leave open practice change pending randomized confirmation.
Exercise echocardiography has become a significant tool of non-invasive valuation of coronary artery disease (CAD). The Exercise echocardiography and dobutamine stress echocardiography are widely applied methods with different clinical procedures and indications. Objective: To determine the exercise echocardiography and dobutamine stress echocardiography in the assessment of suspected or known coronary artery disease. Methods: 260 consecutive patients endured Stress Echocardiography in the Cardiology department of NICVD Karachi for one-year duration from January 2021 to December 2021. The treadmill was used for Exercise echocardiography applying the Bruce protocol. The standard method was applied for dobutamine stress echocardiography. The Stress Echocardiography was taken as positive on the basis of the appearance of worsening or new wall motion abnormalities. Results: Exercise echocardiography performed by 160 patients and DSE in 100 subjects with mean age of 47.21 and 53.10 years, correspondingly. Males were dominated in both groups. The both groups have similar risk factors. In the diagnosis of CAD, Exercise echocardiography was used more often than dobutamine stress echocardiography (61.5% vs 38.5%). The Viability tests have been carried out exclusively by DSE. The frequency of adverse events was 29% in dobutamine stress echocardiography and no one has side-effects in exercise echocardiography. Stress-related dysfunction of left ventricle was much communal in dobutamine stress echocardiography. Conclusion: Exercise Echocardiography is a better and safer non-invasive imaging method among subjects who can execute exercise, but DSE is further beneficial for pre-operative evaluation, viability and patients who are disabled physically for ergometer and treadmill exercise test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalid et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Suspected or known coronary artery disease (n=260). Exercise Echocardiography vs. Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography was evaluated on Adverse events. Exercise echocardiography was associated with no adverse events, whereas dobutamine stress echocardiography had a 29% adverse event rate in patients evaluated for coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: