Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Research suggests that dementia patients detect fewer action errors than age-matched controls; however, little is known about the derivation of their error-monitoring difficulties. The aims of the study are to evaluate a novel, task-training action intervention (TT-NAT) designed to increase error monitoring in dementia patients and to pinpoint the relation between error monitoring and neuropsychological processes. METHOD: Participants (n = 45) with dementia were administered the Standard NAT, a performance-based test requiring completion of three everyday tasks. A second group (n = 42) was administered the TT-NAT, which includes a brief training session prior to the commencement of each task. All participants were compared on the following variables: total errors, proportion of errors detected, and proportion of errors corrected. Correlations between error-monitoring variables and neuropsychological tests of executive functioning and language were performed. RESULTS: TT-NAT participants produced fewer total errors and detected significantly more errors than Standard NAT participants (z = 3.0; t = 3.36; p < .05). Error detection was strongly related to only the language composite index (r = .57, p = .00) in the TT-NAT, whereas it was moderately related to both the language (r = .31, p = .04) and executive composite (r = .36, p = .02) indices in the Standard NAT condition. CONCLUSION: Review of task steps and objects before task performance may be a promising intervention for error-monitoring deficits in dementia patients; this finding has implications for neuropsychological rehabilitation of functional deficits in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bettcher et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: