Key result
Double filtration plasmapheresis and thermofiltration are non-inferior to LDL adsorption for lipid removal in FH.
Why the study?
Do double filtration plasmapheresis and thermofiltration provide similar efficacy and safety compared to LDL adsorptive methods in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia?
RCT (n=5)
Do double filtration plasmapheresis and thermofiltration provide similar efficacy and safety compared to LDL adsorptive methods in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia?
Double filtration plasmapheresis and thermofiltration are effective and safe alternatives to LDL adsorption for treating heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, with potentially greater removal of certain lipoproteins and fibrinogen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May support DFPP and thermofiltration as alternatives in heterozygous FH; leaves open randomized confirmation of long-term outcomes.
Suzuki et al. (1996) conducted an RCT in Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (n=5). Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) and thermofiltration (TFPP) vs. Low-density lipoprotein adsorptive (PA) method was evaluated on Removal rates of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B. Double filtration plasmapheresis and thermofiltration were not inferior to the low-density lipoprotein adsorptive method for lipid removal in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: